University of Urbino vs Istituto Superiore per le Industrie Artistiche di Urbino - ISIA vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs LUISS Guido Carli
Side-by-side comparison from 167 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and competent professors.
- +Unique language programs with practical applications.
- +Beautiful campus and city environment.
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and experienced faculty
- +Diverse and supportive student community
- +Well-structured and effective academic programs
- +Well-designed, interdisciplinary courses and knowledgeable professors
- +Engaging, real-world learning and diverse international student body
- +Organized university with good campus facilities
- +Rigorous academics and top professors
- +Real-world application and practical skills
- +Personal and professional development
- +Career-focused and interesting courses
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Modern and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of clear academic guidance and support.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and unresponsiveness.
- -Lack of course structure, insufficient depth, and program inconsistency.
- -Limited student support and disregard for student concerns.
- -Inadequate teaching style and lack of professor accessibility.
- -Poor student support and excessive academic pressure.
- -Language barriers and incompetent staff hinder understanding.
- -Excessive fees and unclear financial policies are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from faculty and administration are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
This institution receives its highest marks for Professors, achieving a rating of 4.57. Facilities, Accomodation, and Value are also rated positively, all scoring 4.29. Student Life and Location are consistent with a 4.17 rating. The area with the lowest score is Internationality, at 3.71.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.21. **Internationality** (4.14) and **Value** (4.18) also received strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.19. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Student Life fall within a moderate to good range, reflecting a generally positive but uneven performance.
This institution garners exceptional marks in its facilities, achieving a score of 4.54. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, both at 4.36, closely followed by location (4.33) and value (4.29). Student life is also a positive aspect, rated at 4.19. The lowest rated area is accommodation, with a score of 3.65.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, and location are all highly rated, achieving near-perfect marks. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other metrics. The overall value of the university is rated very favorably.
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
With 100% positive feedback and an average of 4.4/5 stars, students praise outstanding professors, valuable language programs, and personal growth opportunities. The university's beautiful setting and supportive services are also frequently highlighted.
Nothing to show
University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.
With ~74% of 77 reviews being positive, students praised organized courses and engaging learning experiences. A small minority, ~6.5%, reported poor organization and communication issues. The average rating is 4.13/5.
Nearly 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense, deep courses, real-world challenges, and personal growth. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions an unengaging teaching style and limited student assistance for academic matters.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students praise the interesting courses, career opportunities, supportive staff, and good facilities. Some mention a desire for more international focus.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.
The ability of LUISS Guido Carli to foster an excellent learning environment is truly unparalleled. Due to the several committed and capable professors at LUISS Guido Carli, I have had a really positive private involvement. Because I could visit the campus anytime I needed help with my academic schedule, I had a terrific time at LUISS Guido Carli. During my two and a half years there, every instructor was excellent and showed me a lot. I would recommend it to someone who is having trouble deciding what they want to do going forward.
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
