University of Sunderland vs Western University - UWO vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs General Assembly vs Fanshawe College

Side-by-side comparison from 214 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: General Assembly (5.00)
University of Sunderland: wins 0/7 categories
Western University - UWO: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
General Assembly: wins 4/7 categories
Fanshawe College: wins 0/7 categories
Douglas College New Westminster: wins 1/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Sunderland, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Best programme: Health Science
Best programme: Culinary Arts
New York City, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
London, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: Accounting
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.51
4.32
4.56
5.00
Win
3.95
3.88
4.47
Location
4.15
3.78
4.78
5.00
Win
4.14
4.71
3.13
Professors
4.43
3.97
4.67
4.00
4.24
4.88
Win
4.27
Internationality
4.24
4.20
4.67
Win
3.00
4.05
4.38
3.87
Student life
4.07
4.46
4.00
5.00
Win
3.81
4.25
4.20
Value
4.16
4.11
4.00
4.00
4.14
4.25
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.75
4.00
3.22
5.00
Win
3.95
3.13
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world focused curriculum and skills
  • +Supportive and dedicated instructors and learning environment
  • +International exposure and English-taught programs
  • +Engaging curriculum with practical application
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Welcoming campus community and involvement opportunities
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities
  • +Supportive, expert faculty and practical, industry-relevant programs
  • +Strong student support services and welcoming community
  • +Well-rounded education with hands-on learning and updated curriculum
  • +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
  • +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
  • +Abundant student resources for academic success
  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Insufficient lecturers and feeling left behind in the course.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Limited resources and support hinder academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support from instructors
  • -Feeling that the course is a waste of time and money
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Facilities and professors stand out as the university's strongest assets, receiving the highest marks. Student life and location also scored well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Accommodation, however, received the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement. Internationality and value were rated moderately, reflecting a generally positive but not exceptional standing.

This university garners excellent reviews, particularly for its student life, scoring a high 4.46. Facilities also received strong marks at 4.32. Conversely, location and professors received the lowest ratings, both falling below 4.0. Accommodations and internationality are rated at a solid 4.0 and 4.2 respectively. Overall value is also positively acknowledged at 4.11.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Academic and location-based aspects of the university are particularly well-regarded. Professors received an excellent rating, closely followed by strong scores for Location and Value. Student Life and Facilities showed solid performance, with Accomodation also scoring comparably. Internationality also ranks positively. The weakest area, though still a good score, is Student Life, with Facilities and Accomodation also falling slightly behind the top performers.

A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 64 reviews, ~84% are positive, praising practical, UK-standard curricula and supportive lecturers. A single negative review (~1.6%) mentioned insufficient lecturers and unmet course expectations.

Approximately 99% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, a welcoming campus, and a good balance of theory and practical application. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nearly all students (~95%) praise excellent programs, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small percentage (~5%) reported negative experiences with faculty teaching abilities and course value.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
40%
67%
100%
38%
63%
47%
4★
44%
50%
33%
0%
52%
25%
47%
3★
14%
10%
0%
0%
5%
13%
7%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Journalism Program

The Journalism program at Fanshawe is one of the best in the country, I would highly recommend for anyone interested in the field. The professors are amazing, classes are small, and you really get to do field journalism

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close