EADA Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM vs Universidad de La Rioja
Side-by-side comparison from 303 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and relevant, up-to-date content
- +Enriching multicultural environment and diverse peer network
- +Practical application of knowledge and real-world focus
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Practical work experience and career preparation
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Enriching international environment and social connections
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Excellent and supportive teaching staff
- +Positive and familiar campus environment
- +Valuable and relevant course content
- +Practical, theory-practice blend curriculum
- +Flexible online learning for work-life balance
- +Supportive, experienced faculty
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Lack of essential program components
- -Arbitrary grading and inflexibility
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and poor course structure frustrate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent professor seriousness and lack of clear syllabi negatively impacted learning.
- -Insufficient practical application in the curriculum was a major drawback.
- -Students are frustrated by a lack of practical application and disorganized, repetitive content.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues, including pressure tactics, unclear conditions, and miscommunication.
- -Concerns are raised about misleading program information, undisclosed costs, and a failure to deliver promised credentials.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, excelling notably in **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very strong ratings. The university's weakest area, according to this data, is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are all rated favorably.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Equally strong are **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both scoring 4.63. **Value** and **Professors** also receive favorable marks around 4.53. The area with the lowest rating is **Location**, at 3.95, indicating it's the primary point for potential improvement. **Accomodation** is rated moderately at 4.11.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
This institution garners particularly strong praise for its Location, achieving the highest score. Student Life and Value also received favorable ratings. Areas for potential improvement include Professors and Internationality, which scored the lowest among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and Accommodation were rated moderately well.
Analysis of the university's ratings reveals that **Professors** are the strongest area, earning a score of 3.62. The university also performs well in **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring above 3.2. In contrast, **Facilities** emerge as the weakest point, with a rating of 2.88. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are also areas with moderate scores, falling just below 3.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising academic quality, professors, and the international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) notes administrative issues or curriculum shortcomings.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a 4.44/5 average, 24 out of 25 reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent faculty, good facilities, and valuable real-world work experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, an amazing campus, and relevant, up-to-date course content. A small amount of negative feedback points to a lack of clear syllabi and practical application.
~74% of 26 reviews are positive, with students appreciating practical, theory-based programs and flexible online formats. ~31% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing disorganization, theoretical content, and undisclosed costs.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
Nothing to show
First, since I asked for information for the ELE Master, I had the advisor constantly pressuring me to decide, to enroll, to PAY, to sign... she would not leave me alone for a day. Up to that point, I didn't like it, but I thought, well, it was their way of selling, 1st red flag. 2nd red flag: When signing the registration on the platform, they asked me if I agreed with the conditions, but the conditions did not appear anywhere, to which I told the advisor that I could not sign a document where they asked me if I agree to the conditions that are not explained to me. She responded by saying that there was "nothing strange", and that the conditions were that I was going to study at the university, and I was surprised that a supposedly serious institution believes that one must accept the conditions that they tell you orally, is it Seriously?, 3rd red flag. However, I wanted to continue trusting (silly me) and I signed. However, I told advisor Pilar Fuentes that, as a suggestion, the conditions should be explicitly described in that document, to which she did not respond anything, nor to my question about what the next step was. Two days passed and still no response. I asked him again what the next step was and three days later he responded: "Hello, how can I help you?" As if he didn't know me, I repeated the question again, which remained unanswered for two more days, that is, 5 in total. (4th red flag), clearly showing that this university only cares about PROFIT. Once they take money from you, they forget. During those days, another person already sent me the "20 installments" in which I had to pay, which surprised me again because no one asked me how I was going to pay. When I asked this person about it, he told me I had SIGNED for 20 installments... (5th red flag). What other surprise were they going to come up with that I had signed? But of course, it was my mistake to accept what the advisor told me. When I wrote to this advisor again to tell her that she couldn't believe that she still hadn't answered me after 5 days and that she wasn't going to give another cent to this university, she just reacted with a not very credible excuse. I demanded the return of MY money (290 USD) and despite the fact that I explained to them in the discharge department that I had completely lost confidence in the institution due to lack of professionalism and transparency, and despite the fact that I offered to give them details of what happened, little They didn't care and told me they wouldn't give me ANYTHING back. In other words, I confirmed the advisor's attitude, but that this is a problem not only for her, but also for an institutional problem. The least you expect when you complain about a terrible service is that the person providing said service is a little embarrassed and at least returns the money that is not theirs. But hey, let it benefit them. As for me, I will tell all my colleagues about this terrible experience so that they can look for a university that is worth it. And I hope my review helps others not to fall into the trap.
Nothing to show
