EADA Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universitat de les Illes Balears
Side-by-side comparison from 337 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international community and networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with practical business applications
- +Positive personal and professional development experiences
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Welcoming people and active campus life
- +Comprehensive and complementary programmes
- +Practical learning opportunities and real-world application
- +Welcoming campus atmosphere and supportive professors
- +Positive student interactions and approachable staff
- +High-quality teaching and specialized programs
- +Friendly, professional, and experienced teachers
- +Valuable extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry focus
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive and personalized learning environment
- -- Lack of effective career services and job placement support.
- -- Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and arbitrary grading.
- -- Administrative inflexibility and poor communication regarding program logistics.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Poor professor English proficiency and lack of care for international students.
- -Disorganization and a lack of a cohesive program structure.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a constant problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of engaging or relevant course content is frequently criticized.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
This university garners particularly high marks for its Location, with a near-perfect score. Student Life and Internationality also stand out as strong areas. Among the lower-scoring categories, Accommodations received the least favorable rating, followed by Facilities. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive reception across most assessed aspects.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
This university garners strong marks in academics and overall experience, with Professors receiving the highest rating at approximately 3.9 and Facilities closely following at 3.83. Student Life and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation and Internationality, both rated at 3.44, indicating these aspects may not meet the same high standards as other surveyed categories.
A balanced profile emerges from these university ratings, with the strongest area being its facilities, scoring a solid 4. Performance is also notable in professors, location, and student life, all receiving 3.6. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.8. Internationality and value for money are rated moderately, at 3.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its desirable **Location** and vibrant **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.
This institution receives a well-rounded set of ratings. **Professors** are the highest-rated area, closely followed by **Student Life** and **Location**. **Accommodations** emerge as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Around 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting a multicultural environment, practical learning, and strong networking. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with career services and administrative rigidity.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.94/5, students highlight positive interactions and campus life. A small percentage (~6%) express disappointment, citing low academic rigor and English proficiency concerns.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 from 6 reviews, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive). Recurring themes include a friendly campus atmosphere, approachable professors, and good faculty.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5. Positive feedback highlights friendly, professional teachers and engaging extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was reported.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving high ratings. Students highlight an enriching, practical learning experience, international environment, and strong professional preparation. There is no negative feedback.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm a physoterapiy student at the University of the Balearic Islands. I recently finished the second year, so I can give my opinion about my teachers and the structure of my campus. In this two years I had some perfect teachers. Their are teachers of Biomechanic, Anatomy and fisiology of the muscle and bone system, palpatory anatomy and image diagnostic, Valoration in physoterapy and Kinesiotherapy. In terms of my campus, there are 5 classes that have stretchers, but not all of them are regulable. Also the students have the possibility to go to the Campus sport, paying a monthly fee or another possibilities (it's very cheap and have a lot of installations).
Nothing to show
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
