EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs INSA Business, Marketing & Communication School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Johan Cruyff Institute
Side-by-side comparison from 468 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, case-based learning with industry connections.
- +Supportive, family-like atmosphere and international community.
- +Modern, wide-ranging curriculum with inspiring professionals.
- +Experienced professors and practical business insights
- +International and diverse student community
- +Strong emphasis on practical application and career development
- +Supportive faculty and personal growth opportunities
- +Industry connections and career preparation
- +Friendly environment and family-like atmosphere
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
- +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
- +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative & management issues lead to poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure cause inconvenience.
- -Program content and delivery do not always meet advertised expectations.
- -- Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and poor student support.
- -- Educational quality is considered basic, with a lack of proper facilities and learning resources.
- -- The university prioritizes financial gain over genuine educational experience and accreditation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Educational content and program delivery are frequently inadequate.
- -Promises made regarding job placement and accreditation are often unfulfilled.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, notably in its **Location** (4.94) and **Internationality** (4.79). **Facilities** (4.51) and **Student Life** (4.54) also receive very positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating (4.14), though it still remains a respectable score.
An assessment of this university reveals strong performance in **Internationality (4.70)** and **Location (4.68)**, indicating excellent global appeal and advantageous placement. Student life and facilities also received positive scores, around 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation (3.49)**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with distinct strengths in its international reach and location.
Offering a compelling student experience, this institution excels in its **Internationality**, scoring a remarkable 4.5. Professors and location also received high marks at 4.0. However, areas for improvement include **Facilities**, rated at 3.17, and **Value** at 3.0, indicating these aspects are less strong compared to others. Student life and accommodation are moderately rated.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Over 140 reviews highlight excellent, practical courses, strong industry connections, and a supportive, international community. A small percentage of feedback noted administrative issues and program delivery inconsistencies.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors and international networking opportunities. Negative feedback, about 7.9%, cites disorganization and basic course content. The average rating is 3.83/5.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting growth, supportive faculty, and career preparation through industry connections. Negative feedback, about 29% of reviews, mentions frustrations with administrative issues and some curriculum concerns.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
I applied for a Master in English as the master coordinator promised me it is available. On my first day I found out they only had it in Spanish, so I moved from Germany to Spain for a Master where I couldn't understand anything and of course, it was already very late to apply for another University or Business School. I wrote a Mail to the coordinator as the people in the front office couldn't help me, but I didn't get an answer. As well I tried to call but you only have the number of the front office and they always told me the coordinator is busy or when they told me he will call me back I didn't get a call. After a while, I got the Information that I will get my money back but I had to fill in a form. Of course, I didn't get the form in the time period the coordinator promised me and I had to try to call again. Same as last time I had no chance to speak with him. At the end, I contacted a lawyer and wrote a last mail to the coordinator. He replied 10 minutes later...! I can not recommend this business school!! Even I had the chance to visit two different classes for one session and the lecturer explained very practical which was good but very very slow. You also have to take care because you won't get a Master of Science or Art or anything accepted in der European Region.
Nothing to show
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
