EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs UIC Barcelona vs Johan Cruyff Institute
Side-by-side comparison from 504 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging faculty and practical case-study methodology
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong international student community
- +Career-focused, enriching academic experience
- +Supportive community and approachable, knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Practical, engaging courses with real-world business insights
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and passionate professors
- +Small class sizes and diverse, international student community
- +Strong focus on business mindsets and entrepreneurial support
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Flexible online learning format
- +Comprehensive and relevant curriculum
- +Efficient support and accessible materials
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues cause inflexibility and poor communication.
- -Program content may lack depth and sustainability focus is minimal.
- -Arbitrary grading practices are a point of dissatisfaction.
- -Disorganized administration and management issues.
- -Poor quality education and unsupportive facilities.
- -Lack of accreditation and questionable educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues are poorly handled and lack organization.
- -Low educational level and unfulfilled promises regarding internships are a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of proper resources are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This university presents a well-rounded academic and social experience. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving an outstanding 4.93. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also score highly, indicating a vibrant and diverse campus environment. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest point, with a rating of 4.13. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are all solid, hovering around the 4.4 to 4.5 mark.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out at an impressive 4.7. Student Life also scores well, nearing 4.2. However, **Accomodation** presents a notable weaker point, receiving a score of 3.46. Facilities and Professors both hover around the 4.0 mark, with Value slightly lower at 3.87.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in **Internationality (4.625)** and **Location (4.379)**, alongside high marks for **Professors (4.219)**. Student Life and Value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.75)** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with Facilities also scoring moderately.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This university garners excellent feedback, particularly in its **location**, which received the highest score. Professors and facilities also earned strong marks. While overall student life and internationality are well-regarded, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still positive, rating. The value proposition is considered perfect.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Approximately 97.7% of 178 reviews are positive, praising enriching academics, knowledgeable faculty, and practical case-study methods. A small fraction of reviews noted issues with administration or program delivery.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere, strong community, and knowledgeable, supportive professors. A small percentage (~7.6%) of negative feedback points to disorganization and a basic curriculum.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong faculty engagement, personalized learning, and a diverse international community. A small portion (~8.8%) of negative feedback points to administrative issues and perceived low educational standards.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.78/5. Students highly recommend ENEB for its flexibility, comprehensive curriculum, and valuable additional courses.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
I highly recommend the Master’s in Project Management course at ENEB for anyone considering a career in this field. The course is entirely online, making it convenient for those with busy schedules, and it includes valuable additional courses like Business English and specialized modules from Harvard Business School. The quality of the material is veri high and very comprehensive, providing a strong foundation for beginner project managers or those who are just starting to explore this field. It’s also well-suited for small business owners looking to develop strategic planning skills. Overall, a great choice for gaining practical, applicable knowledge in project management!
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
