EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs ESIC Business & Marketing School
Side-by-side comparison from 522 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, case-based learning with contemporary HR and sustainability focus
- +Strong international community and networking opportunities
- +Engaging teaching from industry professionals and well-structured courses
- +Practical, real-world business education
- +Diverse, international student community
- +Opportunities for networking and career development
- +Knowledgeable and engaged professors
- +Diverse international student community
- +Well-structured assignments and accessible digital tools
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
- +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
- +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Program content and delivery do not meet expectations.
- -Grading is perceived as arbitrary.
- -Disorganization and administrative issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality, staff helpfulness, and facilities are subpar.
- -The institution prioritizes profit over genuine educational support and accreditation.
- -Poor program quality and low educational standards.
- -Ineffective administration and lack of student support.
- -Disorganized operations and failure to meet promised internship assistance.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
This institution receives excellent marks across several areas. Its **location** is its strongest asset, followed closely by its **internationality**. **Student life**, **facilities**, and **professors** are also highly rated. The university's **value** for money is also a positive point. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **accommodation**.
This university shows particularly strong performance in its location and internationality, both receiving high scores. Student life and facilities also stand out positively. However, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other aspects. The value and professor ratings fall in the mid-range, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these categories.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a high score of 4.54. **Professors** and **Location** also received strong ratings, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.95. **Facilities** and **Student Life** received moderate scores, around 3.5. The **Value** rating sits at a respectable 3.88.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.
The vast majority of reviews (98%) are positive, highlighting modern methodologies, practical case-based learning, and networking opportunities. A small percentage of negative feedback (2%) mentioned issues with course scheduling and administration.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and networking. Approximately 8% are negative, citing disorganization, basic education, and unhelpful staff.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors and a diverse, engaging learning environment. A small portion of feedback (~10.7%) raises concerns about program utility and organizational support.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
My program here has many outstanding aspects, but one that stands out is the quality of the faculty. They are not only experienced professionals but also active researchers. Their expertise and insights make the program even stronger, especially because they are thorough and ensure each student grasps the material.
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
