EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs ESEI International Business School vs ESADE Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 604 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and relevant, up-to-date content
- +Enriching multicultural environment and diverse peer network
- +Practical application of knowledge and real-world focus
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Engaging, practical learning and knowledgeable, passionate instructors
- +Supportive and friendly staff and a diverse, international student community
- +Beautiful campus and well-organized events and activities
- +Transformative personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Practical learning and supportive, high-quality faculty
- +Collaborative environment and diverse, engaged cohort
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Lack of essential program components
- -Arbitrary grading and inflexibility
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Degree validity and visa extension issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
- -Discrepancies between promised and actual course structure.
- -Administrative and financial issues are frequent concerns.
- -Facilities and technology are perceived as outdated.
- -Lack of emphasis on critical thinking is disappointing.
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, excelling notably in **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very strong ratings. The university's weakest area, according to this data, is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value are all rated favorably.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
This institution shows particularly strong performance in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a 4.4 rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, scoring a 2.8. Ratings for Facilities, Location, and Student Life are consistent at 3.6, while Value sits at a respectable 3.8. Overall, the university excels in academic and global aspects, though on-campus living presents an area for improvement.
A comprehensive evaluation reveals the university excels in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring over 4.2. **Internationality** also stands out positively with a score of 4.03. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, which received the lowest scores around 3.73 and 3.85 respectively. **Student Life** and **Location** received solid mid-range scores.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising academic quality, professors, and the international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) notes administrative issues or curriculum shortcomings.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enjoyable learning experiences, knowledgeable professors, and a diverse, international environment. Two reviews, about 13% of feedback, expressed concerns regarding degree validity for non-European students and visa extensions.
Most reviews are very positive (~91%), highlighting personal and professional growth, unique opportunities, and a strong community. A small percentage (~8.5%) mention concerns about program value, cost, and logistical issues.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Firstly, if you are a non European, studying here is a waste. The degree is not valid anywhere, not even in spain. You won’t be able to extend your visa after the 10 months of your course. My honest review and my struggle is what am pouring down here. I passed out July 2022. They will promise you and send you a link mentioning that visa can be extended. But the answer is NO. Not with a degree here. Why ? When you go for visa renewal after the 10 months, you will be told ESEIs degree is not valid for the same. You will come back to the university , they will send you a link, that will options saying you can extend your visa if you have an internship or job after your course(which is obvious) , second apply for a job seeker visa, but you need to show a lot of amount for the 1 year stay in your bank account, third they will ask you to take another short course or language course to extend. What’s the point!! Also if you go ahead and decide to take one option. The university’s degree is not valid anywhere in Europe. If you are a non European and applying for a full time job anywhere in Europe the degree won’t be valid. Now they will say “UCAM” certified they are. Which you won’t get anytime soon, considering you urgently want to extend your visa before it expires. They won’t let you do more than one internship. If you get internship at another place and your classes are about to end, they won’t help you in any way. :) there are other universities in Spain which you can consider and Germany would be a good option. For anything that you want to know in detail, look for non Europeans who studied in ESEI and talk to them. Do not trust the Indian and other Non-European “working” at ESEI. They are the ones who lied to me to get in.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
