University of Toronto - UofT vs University of British Columbia vs McMaster University vs University of Guelph vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 703 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
University of Toronto - UofT: wins 0/7 categories
University of British Columbia: wins 0/7 categories
McMaster University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Guelph: wins 1/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Douglas College New Westminster: wins 2/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Arts
Hamilton, Canada
4.40
Read more reviews
88 reviews
×
Best programme: Life Science
Best programme: Marketing Management
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Accounting
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.20
4.22
4.25
4.39
4.40
3.88
4.47
Win
Location
4.41
4.46
4.16
4.33
4.70
4.71
Win
3.13
Professors
4.15
4.10
4.24
3.99
4.60
4.88
Win
4.27
Internationality
4.41
4.35
4.50
3.75
4.60
Win
4.38
3.87
Student life
3.91
4.30
4.15
4.42
Win
3.90
4.25
4.20
Value
4.24
4.09
4.38
4.20
3.90
4.25
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.87
3.86
4.08
4.20
3.00
3.13
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academics, world-class professors, and diverse program options
  • +Strong reputation, prestigious school, and networking opportunities
  • +Welcoming community, helpful staff, and accessible campus amenities
  • +Supportive professors and quality academic programs
  • +Excellent facilities and welcoming student community
  • +Abundant resources and practical learning opportunities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse and inclusive student environment
  • +High-quality academic programs and learning opportunities
  • +Welcoming campus and friendly community
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty
  • +Opportunities for involvement and balanced student life
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
  • +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
  • +Abundant student resources for academic success
  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues plague student services and support.
  • -The focus on research overshadows practical learning and career preparation.
  • -Student life and wellness are unsatisfactory due to high competitiveness and lack of resources.
  • -Course selection and academic planning are difficult.
  • -Poor quality teaching in some classes and arbitrary grading exist.
  • -Social life outside of clubs is often disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum
  • -Program focus is too narrow and misaligned with student expectations.
  • -Lack of administrative support and clear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

With a diverse set of ratings, this institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.41. **Location** is also a significant strength at 4.38, followed closely by **Value** at 4.24. The most notable area for improvement appears to be **Student Life**, which received the lowest rating at 3.80, closely followed by **Accomodation** at 3.85. Other categories like Facilities and Professors are rated solidly above average.

This university scores highly across most surveyed aspects, with location emerging as its strongest point at 4.45. Student life and internationality also received excellent marks, both above 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.86, which is notably lower than other categories. Facilities, professors, and value for money all fall within a solid, mid-range score of 4.08 to 4.21.

This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in **Internationality (4.5)** and **Value (4.375)**. Facilities and Professors also receive high marks, averaging above 4.2. The weakest area, while still strong, is **Accomodation (4.08)**, followed closely by Student Life and Location, which are all rated just above 4.1. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive student experience.

This institution demonstrates strong student satisfaction, particularly in **Student Life**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also scored well. Areas with slightly lower scores include **Internationality**, indicating potential for growth in global engagement, and **Professors**, suggesting room for improvement in teaching quality. Overall, the university presents a positive student experience, with a good balance across most aspects.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students praise an excellent academic environment with knowledgeable professors and diverse opportunities. The university holds a strong reputation, particularly in research. Limited negative feedback (~1.6%) briefly mentions student services, high competitiveness, and course memorization.

With ~86% positive reviews and an average 4.23 rating, students praise academic programs, supportive professors, and excellent facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions challenges with course selection and finding genuine connections.

With an average rating of 4.43/5 from 88 reviews, ~74% highlight a great experience, noting remarkable environments, collaboration, diversity, and supportive professors. Learning opportunities and facilities were also frequently praised.

University reviews show strong satisfaction (~90%) with a welcoming campus, supportive faculty, and engaging academics. A small amount of feedback (~1%) noted program specificity.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
38%
53%
41%
60%
63%
47%
4★
48%
49%
36%
49%
40%
25%
47%
3★
13%
12%
10%
9%
0%
13%
7%
2★
1%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
PhD Psyc

The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!

Underwhelming

I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.

Combined Honors in Economics and Mathematics

Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.

University of Guelph Undergrad Experience

The University of Guelph is great for several reasons. The campus is very nice and well-maintained with a variety of delicious food options for everyone. There are plenty of opportunities to get involved on campus regardless of program or interest, and the people running those programs are extremely welcoming. There are also many job opportunities on campus for students. Overall, the campus life and social aspect of the University is amazing. As for classes and professors, the majority of my review is positive. I had some great classes and some great professors, however, I found many to be teaching just for the sake of it, reading off slides, and hardly engaging with students. Furthermore, I felt some classes were unnecessary for my program, and my time could've gone elsewhere. The classes for my program were mostly applicable and useful, however some felt like a waste of time. Overall, the University is amazing, and I would highly recommend it to anyone considering it for their undergrad, wanting to meet people, and really make the most of their time at school.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close