University of Toronto - UofT vs University of British Columbia vs Queen's University vs University Canada West - UCW vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 625 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class professors and high academic standards
- +Networking opportunities and diverse programs/clubs
- +Welcoming environment and accessible campus amenities
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning opportunities
- +Abundant resources, study spaces, and campus support services
- +excellent exchange programs and diverse clubs/events
- +strong sense of community, supportive students, and school spirit
- +beautiful and accessible campus environment
- +Practical, job-market relevant programs with experienced faculty
- +Diverse environment fostering adaptability and confidence
- +Affordable tuition and flexible scheduling
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Rigorous academic challenge and supportive community
- +Character development and resilience building
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -- Administrative and management issues, including understaffed services and long wait times.
- -- Subpar teaching quality and a focus on memorization over genuine learning, with overworked students and TAs.
- -- Lack of career support, insufficient resources, and a highly competitive, often isolating, academic environment.
- -Administrative & course selection issues are frustrating.
- -Social life can feel superficial and exclusive.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some professors subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently considered unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive instruction detracts from the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. It excels in **Internationality** (4.42), **Location** (4.38), and **Value** (4.24). Performance in **Facilities** (4.20) and **Professors** (4.15) is also robust. The areas with the lowest scores are **Student Life** (3.80) and **Accomodation** (3.85).
This institution's surveyed areas reveal a mixed performance. The strongest aspects are Location, scoring 4.45, closely followed by Internationality at 4.35 and Student Life at 4.31. Facilities also received a commendable 4.22 rating. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.86, while Professors and Value fall within the mid-range.
This institution presents a generally positive picture, with student life receiving the highest marks at 4.65. Location also scores well at 4.42. Conversely, internationality emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.89. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and value all fall within a solid range of 4.12 to 4.33, indicating a well-rounded experience.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with its **location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **facilities** also received high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating. Other categories like professors, student life, and value fall within a respectable range, indicating a well-rounded but not perfect student experience.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with exceptional scores of 5 out of 5 for Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also rated highly at 4 out of 5. The strongest areas are clearly student experience and perceived value, while its core academic and infrastructural offerings are also robust.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, helpful faculty, and networking. A small ~2% of feedback notes concerns about student services, teaching quality, and workload.
With 4.23/5 stars from 191 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics, professors, and resources. Negative feedback, representing about 1.1%, mentions course selection difficulties and inconsistent professor quality.
With a 4.39/5 average rating from 57 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students praise the university's strong community, excellent exchange programs, and supportive faculty. No negative reviews were submitted.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlights practical, fast-paced programs and experienced professors. Students value academic and professional growth, strong analytical skills, and a diverse environment. No negative reviews were provided.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The single review highlights a prestigious institution with excellent support and a unique campus life, fostering resilience and future readiness.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
