University of Toronto - UofT vs University of Sunderland vs University of British Columbia vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Vancouver Island University - VIU
Side-by-side comparison from 595 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Prestigious reputation and strong academic programs
- +Vibrant campus life and community building
- +Excellent networking opportunities and career development
- +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
- +Challenging academics and rewarding workload
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning opportunities
- +Vibrant campus, abundant resources, and supportive environment
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Supportive faculty and community
- +Small class sizes
- +Valuable academic resources
- +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
- +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
- +Abundant student resources for academic success
- +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
- +Supportive instructors from industry
- +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
- -Administrative and management issues lead to understaffed services and long wait times.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with an overemphasis on research and memorization over practical learning.
- -Lack of adequate career resources and limited opportunities hinder student advancement.
- -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
- -Difficulty with course selection and academic support in large classes.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and arbitrary grading practices.
- -Challenges finding genuine connections and disappointing social scene outside of clubs.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Unsupportive and unprofessional instructors.
- -Excessive and unreasonable program demands.
- -Lack of essential institutional support and fairness.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect of the university. Location and Value also received very positive scores. Conversely, Student Life registered as the lowest-rated area. Accommodations and Professors received moderate to good ratings, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these categories.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.
Evaluations reveal a university excelling in several key aspects. The location garners the highest score, followed closely by internationality and student life, indicating a vibrant and globally connected environment. Professors and value also receive positive, albeit slightly lower, ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Facilities, while solid, are not a standout feature compared to other categories.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
The university garners solid reviews across multiple facets. Its location stands out with the highest rating, suggesting a desirable setting. While several areas, including professors and internationality, score well at 3.5, others like accommodation and facilities show room for improvement with the lowest scores. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture, particularly regarding its external environment.
A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.
Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.
~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting prestigious academics, strong networking, and campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) cite issues with student services and teaching quality.
With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.
Over 86% of reviews praise demanding yet rewarding academics, great study spaces, and excellent resources. A small minority (~1%) mentions course selection difficulties and the struggle to connect with people.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community, approachable faculty, and small class sizes. About 30% of feedback is negative, citing issues with faculty support and program demands.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
What a waste of money and time taking the LPN program. Unless you like to suck up to the instructors forget getting additional help from them, or any help at all. They yell at you, are condescending and treat you like a child. Not an "adult learning" environment like they tell you. Be prepared to to most of your work without instructors in the lab in 2nd year, they constantly disappear. And their expectations are above and beyond what the BCCNM require. I feel they fail students to make the University more money. The way I watched them treat those of different skin color was repulsive as well. Don't waste your money unless you're white and like to kiss a**. Only one instructor out of the whole program actually cares about any of the students. Definitely will need to upgrade my pharmacology elsewhere as that class was a joke.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
