The College of Southern Nevada - CSN vs Riga Technical University - RTU vs Universidad Tecnológica Intercontinental - UTIC vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Hampden – Sydney College
Side-by-side comparison from 98 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable, experienced, and supportive professors
- +Value for money
- +Accessible professors and personalized attention
- +Practical, modern, and applied engineering programmes
- +Well-organized university with excellent faculty and facilities
- +Clear teaching approach and up-to-date curricula
- +Practical knowledge and skills for career application
- +Support and mentorship for lower-level students
- +Supportive and engaging faculty
- +Diverse activities and flexible studies
- +Welcoming international environment
Nothing to show
- +Practical training and hospital exposure
- +Supportive and clear teaching methods
- +International community and global career opportunities
- +Strong interdisciplinary programmes and innovation culture
- +Excellent facilities, cutting-edge labs, and industry collaboration
- +Vibrant student community and city integration
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and lacking essential resources.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or not aligned with current industry needs.
- -Administrative inefficiency and unresponsiveness
- -Poor quality and unhelpful staff/faculty
- -Rising accommodation costs
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and lack of clarity.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a source of frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause student stress.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic environment and student engagement. Professors are highly rated, alongside a vibrant student life and excellent facilities. The university also scores well for its location and overall value. While accommodation is solid, it represents a relative area for improvement compared to other surveyed aspects, as does its internationality rating.
This institution receives positive feedback across most aspects, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated area. **Professors** and **Value** also score well. However, **Accomodation** presents a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated moderately well, indicating room for enhancement.
Across all assessed aspects, this institution achieves perfect scores. Its strongest areas, mirroring its overall excellent performance, include outstanding facilities, distinguished professors, an ideal location, vibrant student life, quality accommodation, robust internationality, and exceptional value for money. There are no discernible weak areas, as every category has been rated with a perfect score.
This university garners strong praise, particularly for its internationality, receiving the highest mark. Professors and facilities also score very well, reflecting positively on academic and physical resources. While student life and value are also rated favorably, accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest score, indicating a potential point for improvement in student living arrangements.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality**, which stands out as its strongest area. Location also receives a high rating, indicating positive aspects in these regards. Areas for potential improvement, based on the provided data, include Facilities, Professors, and Value, all receiving the lowest scores. Student Life and Accomodation are rated moderately well.
This institution receives particularly strong acclaim for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. **Internationality** also ranks highly at 4.5. While most aspects are rated positively, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.8. **Facilities** and **Value** are solid with scores of 4.3, and **Professors** are rated 4.2.
With a 4.11 average rating from 9 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight outstanding, knowledgeable, and supportive professors, along with valuable learning experiences for the price. No negative feedback was reported.
Most reviews (around 74%) highlight practical learning, modern facilities, and clear teaching, with some mentioning specialized engineering programs. A small percentage (about 4.2%) notes administrative delays and less helpful staff.
The single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting a wonderful learning experience that provided useful knowledge.
With a 4.45/5 average rating from 49 reviews, approximately 93% are positive. Students praise friendly, supportive professors, diverse activities, and modern facilities. Some mention group project organization could be improved.
Nothing to show
Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, praising development opportunities, practical training, and supportive staff. About 11% of feedback mentions organizational issues like overlapping classes and exams.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise the university's interdisciplinary programs, innovation culture, modern facilities, and supportive community, alongside the student-friendly city of Brno.
Nothing to show
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Honestly, my love for medicine is what keeps me here. Going to a school in a different country you have to adapt to different customs and ways of doing things which is very different to how things are run in my home country. My issue with this school is the organisation, sometimes classes overlap, sometimes exams overlap with classes and students have to sort this out themselves, which should not be happening. Timetabling and exams shouldn't be the students' responsibility medicine are stressful as it is. As I said this is how things are run in this country.
Nothing to show
