EADA Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universitat de les Illes Balears vs C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S vs Escola d’Art i Superior de Disseny de les Illes Balears
Side-by-side comparison from 283 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international community and networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with practical business applications
- +Positive personal and professional development experiences
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Welcoming campus atmosphere and supportive professors
- +Positive student interactions and approachable staff
- +High-quality teaching and specialized programs
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- +Friendly, professional, and experienced teachers
- +Valuable extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +International environment and diverse perspectives
- +Practical application of neuroscience to business challenges
- +Engaging and insightful learning with relevant skills
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -- Lack of effective career services and job placement support.
- -- Inconsistent quality of teaching staff and arbitrary grading.
- -- Administrative inflexibility and poor communication regarding program logistics.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a constant problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of engaging or relevant course content is frequently criticized.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This university garners particularly high marks for its Location, with a near-perfect score. Student Life and Internationality also stand out as strong areas. Among the lower-scoring categories, Accommodations received the least favorable rating, followed by Facilities. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive reception across most assessed aspects.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
A balanced profile emerges from these university ratings, with the strongest area being its facilities, scoring a solid 4. Performance is also notable in professors, location, and student life, all receiving 3.6. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.8. Internationality and value for money are rated moderately, at 3.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its desirable **Location** and vibrant **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.
Overall, the university receives very positive feedback, with exceptional scores in value (5), professors (4.875), and internationality (4.875). Facilities and student life are also highly rated at 4.857. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 4.285, though still a solid rating. Location also scores well at 4.667.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Around 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting a multicultural environment, practical learning, and strong networking. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with career services and administrative rigidity.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 from 6 reviews, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive). Recurring themes include a friendly campus atmosphere, approachable professors, and good faculty.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5. Positive feedback highlights friendly, professional teachers and engaging extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was reported.
All ten reviews are positive, with students praising the program's international environment and practical application of neuroscience to business. They highlight the valuable knowledge gained, career impact, and engaging classes.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
Nothing to show
I'm a physoterapiy student at the University of the Balearic Islands. I recently finished the second year, so I can give my opinion about my teachers and the structure of my campus. In this two years I had some perfect teachers. Their are teachers of Biomechanic, Anatomy and fisiology of the muscle and bone system, palpatory anatomy and image diagnostic, Valoration in physoterapy and Kinesiotherapy. In terms of my campus, there are 5 classes that have stretchers, but not all of them are regulable. Also the students have the possibility to go to the Campus sport, paying a monthly fee or another possibilities (it's very cheap and have a lot of installations).
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
Nothing to show
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
