SKEMA Business School vs The New School vs St. John's University vs Stevens-Henager College - SHC vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 193 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Personalized, adaptable programs and learning
- +Supportive, engaging faculty and staff
- +Vibrant city environment with opportunities
- +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
- +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
- +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
- +Accessible and supportive educators
- +Abundant learning resources
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- +Excellent teaching quality and diverse academic programs.
- +Positive campus environment and facilities.
- +Overall enjoyable and fulfilling student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and networking opportunities are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and productivity.
- -Inflexible policies and lack of student support are major drawbacks.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. **Professors** are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately, while **Value** sits in a similar range.
The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its Professors, Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are areas with slightly less positive feedback, both scoring a 3. The university offers a well-rounded experience with notable advantages in several key aspects.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Across all assessed areas, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5. It demonstrates exceptional strength in all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With uniformly outstanding ratings, no single area stands out as significantly weaker than others; the university performs at the highest level uniformly.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting fulfilling academic experiences and strong communities. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.
This university has received one positive review, with an average rating of 5/5. The reviewer praised the variety of resources, helpful teachers, and timely communication. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. The single review highlights great faculty, dorms, and buildings, contributing to an excellent average rating of 5/5.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
Nothing to show
