IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales - EHESS vs EDHEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 577 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Exceptional teaching quality from leading researchers.
- +Abundant, unique seminar options and easy professor access.
- +Personalized, autonomous study path with tutor guidance.
- +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
- +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
- +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and global opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -A lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value were disappointing.
- -The program's focus did not align with student expectations or career goals.
- -High tuition costs were not justified by the perceived quality of education and career support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution shines in its **facilities**, **professors**, and **internationality**, all receiving strong ratings. However, prospective students might note lower scores for **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation**. The overall **value** proposition sits in the middle, indicating a mixed but solid offering with clear strengths in academic and global aspects.
The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.
Internationality, Location, and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest attributes, each scoring above 4.25. The university also received a solid rating for its facilities and professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a score of 3.59. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and international appeal.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, reviews are highly positive (~100%). Students praise the exceptional quality of teaching and seminars, noting outstanding professors and researchers. The autonomous, personalized study path is also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.
~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, enriching experiences, and good quality teaching. A small portion of feedback (~5%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and practical value.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
