emlyon business school vs GEM Alpine Business School vs SKEMA Business School vs American University of Paris - AUP vs EDHEC Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 315 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
GEM Alpine Business School: wins 0/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
American University of Paris - AUP: wins 1/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESCE Paris International Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: International Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.10
4.21
3.87
4.20
4.75
Win
3.83
Location
4.66
3.92
4.24
4.09
3.73
4.75
4.92
Win
Professors
4.12
4.19
4.41
4.45
4.32
4.75
Win
4.58
Internationality
4.63
4.06
4.35
4.14
4.41
4.50
4.92
Win
Student life
4.30
Win
4.20
4.10
4.00
4.14
4.25
4.08
Value
4.49
Win
4.15
4.03
4.18
4.05
4.25
4.17
Accommodation
4.00
3.83
3.56
4.09
Win
3.14
3.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse faculty and global insights
  • +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
  • +Strong networking and international opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Supportive environment & personalized attention
  • +Experiencing Paris while studying
  • +Diverse student body & knowledgeable professors
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs taught by industry professionals
  • +Supportive staff and personalized learning experiences
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
  • -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of clear guidance are recurring problems.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

Academically, this institution garners impressive scores, particularly in the **Professors** category, achieving a strong 4.45. **Value** is also highly regarded at 4.18. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the lowest-rated aspect, standing at 3.87. Other areas like Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality all received solid ratings above 4.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, and location, all scoring an impressive 4.75. Student life and value are also well-regarded at 4.25, with internationality close behind at 4.5. The weakest area of performance is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its core offerings and campus environment.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

All 23 reviews are positive, with students highlighting the supportive and sheltered environment, personalized attention, and enriching experiences in Paris. There were no negative reviews.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent international environments and engaging programs, often taught by experienced professionals. Some note a preference for in-person learning over online options.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
63%
44%
49%
22%
39%
25%
67%
4★
27%
46%
42%
78%
52%
75%
25%
3★
10%
10%
7%
0%
9%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
0%
2%
0%
8%
1★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Positive feedback

Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

An Impeccable Group of Staff

In an MSc fast track program, I had the privilege of spending time a large and intensive period with each educator, including supporting staff. From core marketing classes to general soft skill and one on one meetings, a large sum went above and beyond what was expected. From moral, educational, in some cases emotional support, the staff laid down a foundation for me to grow and reach my truest potential. In their own personal capacities, each staff took a unique approach to part with their knowledge, wisdom, support and experience. From an educational perspective, the educators sparked curiosity, critical and analytical thinking in me, allowing me to look at the world of business, advertising and marketing in a new light. While some information may have come across as “far fetched” or “hard to believe” it showcased that the program wasn’t merely looking to scratch the surface, but project the future, years in advance. With majority of the courses I take, I found my own passion for the content, mounding it in a way that I could use, apply and consider in my professional career. However, at the core of my memorable experience was the personal contact I had with a large majority ESCE professional staff. They made me feel welcome, accepted, and seen, allowing me to voice my thoughts, my own experience, and knowledge. I believe my masters success would not be possible without the influence of all members at ESCE.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close