ESSEC Business School vs Instituto Universitario de Seguros - IUS vs Cadi Ayyad University Marrakesh vs FST Marrakech vs Doshisha University
Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Prime city center location with convenient access and ample parking.
- +Well-structured campus layout and a comprehensive, up-to-date syllabus.
- +Supportive & approachable professors
- +Wide range of academic programs & specializations
- +Calm, focused academic environment with practical learning
Nothing to show
- +Strong internationalization efforts
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, practical instruction with professional instructors
- +Modern facilities and a vibrant multicultural environment
- +Valuable career preparation through projects, internships, and international programs
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as insufficient.
- -Outdated and poor-quality facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unreliable instructors are frustrating.
- -Lack of new hires and outdated faculty negatively impacts the student experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative disorganization and unfulfilled school services.
- -Outdated curriculum and ineffective teaching.
- -Lack of career advancement opportunities post-graduation.
Nothing to show
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources lead to a poor learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern equipment hinder educational progress.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication create frustration.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Academic and experiential strengths define this university's profile, with exceptional scores for Professors and Value (both 5/5). Facilities also stand out at 4.6. Conversely, Internationality presents a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 2/5. Accommodations also lag behind at 3.2, with Location and Student Life earning moderate scores of 3.9 each.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across various aspects. Location stands out as a strength, receiving a strong rating of 4. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring a 3. Other categories, including professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized strengths.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. Its strongest point is **Internationality**, receiving a significantly higher rating than other categories. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Professors** are identified as the weakest aspects, both scoring at the lowest mark. Student life, accommodation, and value also fall within a similar moderate range.
Nothing to show
When examining this university's performance, notable strengths emerge in the **professors** and **accommodation** categories, both receiving a high score of 4. However, **facilities** and **internationality** present areas for improvement, scoring a lower 2. The university offers a moderate experience in terms of **location** and **student life**, with a value rating of 4 suggesting good return on investment.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
This university has a perfect 5/5 rating based on one review. The single review was highly positive, praising excellent organization, convenient city location, and a comprehensive syllabus. No negative feedback was received.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, a calm academic environment, and practical learning opportunities. A small portion of feedback, about 11.1%, notes occasional teacher unreliability and poor facilities.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 2/5, ~67% of reviews are negative. Students cite disorganization, outdated curriculum, and lack of career advancement. One positive review notes internationalization efforts.
Nothing to show
This university has a single review with a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights a great learning environment, modern facilities, and excellent instructors. Group projects, internships, and exchange programs are also noted as strengths.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
