Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de Cuyo - UNCUYO vs Hellenic Open University - HOU vs Kask & Conservatorium School of Arts Gent - KASK vs Shantou University
Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
- +Committed and experienced teaching staff
- +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
- +Inspiring professionals and personalized support for growth
- +Academic excellence and diverse program offerings
- +Comfortable environment and beautiful surroundings
- +Flexible distance learning
- +Supportive and qualified academic staff
- +Well-organized and high-quality programs
- +Supportive staff and practical assistance for students
- +Dedicated instructors offering extra help and resources
- +Opportunities for internships and organized excursions
- +Student-centered approach and personalized development
- +Excellent accommodation and modern facilities
- +Liberal academic atmosphere and international standards
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
- +Comfortable, well-equipped, and inspiring learning environments
- +Vibrant student life and opportunities for growth
Nothing to show
- -Poor management and administrative support
- -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
- -Unattractive facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of essential course materials and unclear expectations are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and negatively impact students.
- -Academic program quality and staff qualifications are frequently criticized.
- -Program structure and degree validity are concerns for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of support, unclear communication, and administrative problems frustrate students.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-taught.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a strong 4.6. Professors also earned high marks at 4.6. The **Facilities** are well-regarded at 4.4, while **Accomodation** is the lowest rated, though still a respectable 4.2.
The university demonstrates its strongest performance in the quality of its professors, receiving a high rating. Conversely, student life and facilities represent areas where improvement could be beneficial, as indicated by lower scores. Other aspects, such as location, accommodation, and internationality, fall within a moderate range, with value for money also scoring reasonably well.
This university presents a uniform evaluation across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. Every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit low, performance level across the board, indicating areas where significant improvements may be necessary in all surveyed domains.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, student life, and accommodation. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, at a strong 4. The university's weakest aspect, however, is its location, receiving a score of only 2. Overall, it offers good value for students seeking a vibrant campus experience with excellent amenities.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.
Students praise the National University of Cuyo for academic excellence, professional preparation, and a supportive, diverse environment, with ~0% negative feedback. The university is recognized for its variety of programs and commitment to research.
~78% of reviews praise the university's flexible distance learning and helpful staff. ~22% of feedback highlights poor organization and administrative issues, including degree validation concerns.
With an average rating of 4/5, the sole review for KASK highlights exceptional support and internship opportunities for international students. Although classes are primarily in Dutch, professors offer extra help to ensure understanding.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives predominantly positive feedback, approximately 100% of reviews are favorable. Students praise its student-centered approach, quality accommodation, modern facilities, and liberal academic atmosphere.
With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
KASK was my host university for my Erasmus studies. It was the first time my university sent someone for Erasmus and they helped with all posible, they provided me with a spot in the residence, and with an internship in one of the professor's architecture studio. Clases are mostly in dutch, so it's not the most suitable place for an Erasmus student, still the teacher always offered to stay after class to go throw the main points in order to make sure I would understand. They also organise trips for the students, they would even put me in contact with a local student in case I would have any doubts, so she would help me out. The building was absolutely beautiful and quite close to the center. Public transport is a close option, but the best to move around and go to the university is the bike. Will definitely go say hi next time I go back to Ghent.
Nothing to show
Life at Universitas Brawijaya is quite dynamic and diverse. Students have the opportunity to get involved in various extracurricular activities, such as student organizations, clubs, and campus events. These activities provide additional experiences that are useful and enrich campus life. Universitas Brawijaya offers various facilities that support academic and non-academic activities.
Nothing to show
