Mondragon University vs Coventry University vs Freiburg University of Education vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs South Eastern Kenya University - seku

Side-by-side comparison from 596 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Mondragon University: wins 0/5 categories
Coventry University: wins 0/5 categories
Freiburg University of Education: wins 0/5 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 3/5 categories
South Eastern Kenya University - seku: wins 2/5 categories
Mauritius Institute of Education - Mie: wins 0/5 categories
Delta University for Science and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Mondragon, Spain
4.80
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Coventry, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
585 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Statistics
Best programme: School of Health Sciences/Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.08
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Location
4.33
3.84
Not rated
5.00
2.00
4.00
5.00
Professors
4.25
4.05
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.50
4.03
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
2.00
3.00
Student life
4.50
4.14
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Value
4.25
3.97
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
3.96
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming environment and ample opportunities for involvement.
  • +Diverse and inclusive community with strong support for student success.
  • +Forward-thinking, practical education aligned with global and social needs.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive staff
  • +Wide range of programmes and practical learning
  • +Modern facilities and well-equipped resources

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Conducive and enjoyable learning environment
  • +Quality education
  • +Peaceful and focused setting

Nothing to show

  • +Quality education & appearance
  • +Program strengths (science, technology, marketing, business)
  • +Organization & communication improvements
Cons
  • -Ineffective communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear grading policies and inconsistent feedback cause confusion.
  • -Lack of staff knowledge and support.
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues.
  • -Focus on profit over student well-being and experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are perceived as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instruction and curriculum quality are frequently criticized.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives high marks, particularly excelling in Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring a near-perfect 4.5. Its Location also garners strong appreciation at 4.33. The Professors and Value categories, while still positive, represent the comparatively lower scores at 4.25. Overall, the institution demonstrates broad strengths with only slight areas for potential improvement.

This institution scores highest in **Student Life**, reflecting vibrant campus experiences. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive very strong marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Location** and **Accomodation**. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with a particular emphasis on student engagement and academic quality.

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Overall, the university showcases a strong profile with excellent scores in Facilities and Student Life, both receiving a perfect 5. Value also stands out with a 5-star rating. However, the Location presents a significant weakness, scoring a low 2. Professors and Internationality are rated moderately at 4 and 3 respectively, with Accomodation also falling in the middle at 3.

Nothing to show

This institution shines brightest in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. Its **Professors** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a 4. However, **Accomodation** is a significant weakness, scoring a 0. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated moderately at 3, with **Internationality** also receiving a 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All five reviews are positive, averaging 4.8/5. Students highlight strong inclusivity, diversity, and ample opportunities for involvement and personal growth, with approximately 0% negative feedback.

With ~90% positive reviews, students praise the welcoming environment, supportive staff, and good learning opportunities. A small percentage of feedback notes issues with organization and staff knowledge.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Students praise the conducive learning environment and enjoyable experience. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback highlights good education quality and appearance, though notes a lack of organization. Negative feedback is minimal.

Rating distribution
5★
80%
15%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
20%
74%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

International Students Think Before Coming

I honestly wouldn’t advise someone to come to this university to be honest. They’re just interested in your money and leave you with no support after that. I’ll advice to spend your money elsewhere because it isn’t worth it AT ALL

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close