Central European University - CEU vs University of Vienna - UNIVIE vs IBS International Business School - IBS vs Sigmund Freud University - SFU vs MODUL University Vienna
Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Low tuition fees & high value
- +International environment & diverse perspectives
- +City's culture & urban campus experience
- +Diverse international student body and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world applicable knowledge and career opportunities
- +Excellent teaching staff and flexible class schedules
- +Expert and passionate professors
- +International study opportunities
- +Well-located campuses and student life
- +Practical, globally focused business education
- +Small class sizes and personalized learning
- +Strong professor mentorship and supportive international atmosphere
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Lack of community and social engagement
- -Poor campus connectivity and accessibility
- -Unapproachable faculty
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is unclear and infrequent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication breakdowns and a lack of responsiveness are deeply disappointing.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a high rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also stand out with favorable scores. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. The university received solid ratings for its Professors, Accomodation, and Value.
This university garners impressive scores across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, followed closely by professors and value. On the other hand, location and accommodation received the lowest ratings, though still within a generally positive range. Overall, student life and facilities also scored well, contributing to a solid academic profile.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its prime **location** and robust **internationality**, both scoring a perfect 5. Excellent **professors** (4.7) and **facilities** (4.3) also contribute to a positive academic environment. Areas for development include **student life** and **accommodation**, both rated at 3.7. The **value** proposition is solid at 4.
This institution receives top marks for its internationality, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also a considerable strength, rated at 4.33. Areas like facilities and location are well-regarded with a 4-star rating. The university shows good value at 4 stars and solid professor quality at 4.67. Accommodations present the weakest area, rated at 3.67.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
Most students (~90%) highly value the university, citing low tuition and an international, culturally rich environment. Rigorous academic programs requiring self-study are noted, with occasional concerns about class waiting lists and limited social interaction.
With a 4.53/5 average, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical knowledge, real-world problem-solving, excellent teaching staff, and a curriculum preparing them for today's world. The international environment, diverse student body, and opportunities to understand different cultures are also frequently highlighted.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight passionate professors and the university's international opportunities. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Recurring themes highlight engaging, practical learning with case studies and real-world projects, fostered by small class sizes and strong professor mentorship within an international and supportive environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- Great University. - Great support system from teachers. - You will meet different nationalities. - Recommendable to anyone. I am a Master student in International Management. This course will help you later for working in Multinationals company and also management level.
I attended Sigmund Freud University during the academic years 2022-2023, and overall, my experience with the faculty was a mix of highs and lows. One thing that stood out positively was the incredible support and dedication shown by the faculty members. The professors at SFU were genuinely invested in their students' success and were always willing to help whenever students sought their guidance. They were approachable, knowledgeable, and went above and beyond to assist students in understanding the course material and academic concepts. However, despite the impressive support from the faculty, I must highlight that the organization at SFU could be improved. The overall system seemed to lack coordination, leading to certain aspects of academic life feeling unorganized. For instance, course schedules and syllabi were sometimes updated at the last minute, causing confusion among students. Additionally, administrative processes, such as course registration and academic advising, could have been smoother and better streamlined. Moreover, some professors struggled with managing their workload and appeared stressed at times, which impacted their ability to provide a consistent and structured learning environment. This lack of organization affected the overall learning experience and hindered students' ability to fully engage with the material. In conclusion, SFU is a place where students can expect a lot of support from faculty members who are passionate about teaching and willing to help. The dedication of the professors is commendable and greatly contributes to the positive learning environment. However, the university could benefit from implementing better organizational strategies to ensure a smoother academic experience for its students. Despite the areas that need improvement, the support and guidance received from the faculty make SFU a worthwhile institution for those seeking a strong support system throughout their academic journey.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
