Universidade de Brasília - UnB vs SKEMA Business School vs Centro Universitário de Brasília - UniCEUB vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 215 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
Universidade de Brasília - UnB: wins 2/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Universitário de Brasília - UniCEUB: wins 1/7 categories
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
Centro Universitário do Distrito Federal: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Universitário UDF: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Acting
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Physical Education
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
4.21
3.80
3.58
4.40
Win
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.50
4.23
3.80
4.11
4.70
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.38
4.39
4.00
4.31
4.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.13
4.40
3.80
3.41
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.25
Win
4.14
3.60
4.03
3.90
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.75
Win
4.07
3.40
4.28
3.90
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
3.33
3.59
3.80
Win
3.04
3.00
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
  • +Well-structured academic programs and diverse opportunities
  • +Strong sense of community and personal growth
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +Excellent infrastructure and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified and accomplished faculty
  • +Strong employability and diploma recognition
  • +Experienced professors with practical application
  • +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
  • +Quality education meeting student expectations
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +strong academic quality
  • +good teaching methods
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks in several key areas. Its location and value are particularly outstanding, both receiving top scores. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present the weakest aspects, with scores indicating room for improvement. The quality of professors is a clear strength.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

With a generally positive performance, this institution excels in its facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a solid 3.8 rating. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.0. However, student life presents a slightly weaker area at 3.6, and value for money is the lowest rated aspect at 3.4, indicating room for improvement in these domains.

This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

This institution receives top marks for its **professors and location**, both scoring a perfect 5. Student life and overall value are also highly rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Areas for improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which all received a 3.5 rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

8 out of 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise strong professors, good academic structure, and valuable opportunities. Minor concerns include bureaucracy and campus distances.

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With a 4/5 average rating, reviews indicate strong positive sentiment (~67%) regarding excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty. Employability and diploma recognition are also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight academic quality and professor dedication. Some suggest campus infrastructure improvements.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
33%
43%
60%
0%
50%
4★
50%
42%
33%
50%
40%
0%
50%
3★
0%
7%
33%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close