emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs Istituto Marangoni vs Macau University of Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 201 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
emlyon business school: wins 0/2 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/2 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 0/2 categories
Istituto Marangoni: wins 0/2 categories
Macau University of Science and Technology: wins 2/2 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/2 categories
University of Macau - UM: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: International Fashion Business
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.21
5.00
3.33
5.00
3.43
Not rated
Location
4.66
4.24
5.00
4.67
5.00
4.64
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.41
5.00
4.33
5.00
3.86
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
4.35
5.00
4.67
5.00
4.50
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.10
2.00
3.67
5.00
Win
4.07
Not rated
Value
4.49
4.03
5.00
4.33
5.00
3.64
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.56
2.00
4.00
5.00
Win
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
  • +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
  • +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
  • +Rapid institutional growth and investment in advanced research.
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.

This institution receives a perfect score in every surveyed category. Its strengths lie across the board, with exceptional marks for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as significantly weaker than others, indicating a consistently excellent experience.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback (~100%) highlights the institution's growth and investment in research. No negative feedback was reported.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
49%
100%
33%
100%
21%
0%
4★
27%
42%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
10%
7%
0%
67%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Educational content

I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close