SKEMA Business School vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education vs i_Xperience
Side-by-side comparison from 1,096 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International environment and diverse student community
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world business application
- +Extensive international exposure and global campus options
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and timely graduation
- +Reliable student services
- +Calm and positive environment
- +Inclusive and supportive environment
- +Strong academic and practical learning
- +Dedicated and approachable staff
- +Innovative programs with modern technology and effective module structures
- +Committed faculty with real-world insights and supportive administration
- +Global and inclusive environment fostering personal development and leadership
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication, exam, and results management.
- -Concerns about teaching faculty and a perception of education being treated as a business.
- -Lack of student guidance and support for career goals.
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
- -Rising study fees and unexpected module changes cause financial strain and dropouts.
- -Overcrowded lecture classes detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Strengths lie in **Internationality**, rated highest at 4.44, followed closely by **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.33). **Facilities** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.25) also received strong scores. The primary area for improvement is **Accomodation**, with the lowest rating of 3.70. **Value** sits at a respectable 4.10.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
An excellent student experience is evident, with top marks awarded for Facilities and Student Life, alongside high scores for Internationality. The university also performs well in terms of Professors and Accomodation. Its weakest area, according to these ratings, is Value, which received a moderate score. Location also garnered a good but not outstanding rating.
Overall, this institution garners favorable ratings, particularly excelling in **Value**, its strongest area. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Location** also received high scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** represent the areas with comparatively lower, though still decent, ratings.
Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both achieving 4.8. **Accommodations** also received a very high rating of 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, **Student Life** registered the lowest score at 4.25, though it remains a solid rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high level of satisfaction across its facilities, professors, and value.
With a 4.37 average rating from 179 reviews, approximately 90% are positive, highlighting a rewarding and transformative experience with academic knowledge, practical learning, and international exposure. A small percentage (~2.2%) of negative feedback cited management issues and poor communication.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
The single review indicates a positive experience, with a ~100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a calm and welcoming atmosphere, reliable services, and timely graduation.
With an average rating of 4.43/5, ~91% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, academic support, and welcoming environments. A small percentage (~9%) express concerns about rising study fees and module changes.
With an average rating of 4.6/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern technology, lecturer support, and engaging module structures. No negative feedback was reported.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
One thing I can say is the support services are very helpful. From class reps who stand on students behalf to communicate with lecturers to facilitators who do group sessions to prepare students for tests and exams and tutors who personally help students individually to clear uncertainties . Lecturers are welcome and willing to help students at all times. It's a great institution.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university was isolated from the real world, I couldn’t connect my studies with the field of work available. Negative for career development. The university students were politically aware of what was happening in the country at the time. Positive as the student played crucial role in bringing political consciousness.
Nothing to show
