EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 572 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Neuro Business School - NBS (5.00)
EADA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
GBSB Global Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Neuro Business School - NBS: wins 5/7 categories
Structuralia: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
4.50
Read more reviews
210 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelors in Business Administration
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Digital Innovation
Best programme: Business Administration
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: BA in NeuroMarketing
Alcobendas, Spain
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.04
3.40
3.88
3.92
4.88
Win
1.00
Location
4.93
Win
4.73
4.49
3.84
4.93
4.71
1.00
Professors
4.47
4.04
4.15
3.91
4.64
4.89
Win
1.00
Internationality
4.79
4.72
4.65
3.41
4.93
Win
4.89
1.00
Student life
4.58
4.22
3.86
3.68
4.15
4.88
Win
1.00
Value
4.44
3.87
3.65
3.58
4.29
5.00
Win
1.00
Accommodation
3.72
3.42
2.85
3.44
3.62
4.38
Win
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse international community & networking opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs with practical business focus
  • +Engaging learning environment with real-world application
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
  • +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
  • +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
  • +Welcoming and social atmosphere for meeting people
  • +Comprehensive and complementary academic programmes
  • +Practical learning opportunities outside the classroom
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Strong practical and business-oriented programs with interdisciplinary knowledge.
  • +Rewarding international environment fostering diverse perspectives and career growth.
  • +High-quality education and top-notch skills development from experienced professors.
  • +Highly relevant and engaging curriculum
  • +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
  • +Strong career support and industry connections
Cons
  • -Ineffective career services and lack of job placement support.
  • -Arbitrary grading and inconsistent teaching quality.
  • -Poor administrative responsiveness and inflexible policies.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Low educational and academic quality
  • -Poor career and internship support
  • -Low English proficiency of some professors and lack of organization.
  • -Feeling of disinterest from both students and faculty towards international students.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources lead to frustration.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of timely and helpful academic support and feedback.
  • -Issues with administrative processes and unclear communication regarding policies.
  • -Outdated course materials and poor quality of instruction.
Rating summary
What students say

The university garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, achieving a score of 4.93. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also stand out with scores of 4.79 and 4.58 respectively. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a rating of 3.72. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are all solid, ranging from 4.44 to 4.50.

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.

Overall, this institution receives solid ratings, with professors and facilities being its strongest aspects. Student life and accommodation show areas for improvement, while value and internationality fall within an average range.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably Professors and Internationality, both at approximately 4.89. Facilities and Student Life also rate highly, around 4.88. Location and Accomodation are strong, though less so than other categories. The university achieves a perfect score for Value, representing its strongest attribute, while Accomodation, at 4.38, is its weakest.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates a uniform performance. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received identical ratings. Similarly, the value proposition of the university is rated precisely the same as its other components. No specific area stands out as a strength or weakness, as all are consistently evaluated at the same level.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University students highly recommend the program, citing enriching multicultural environments and valuable academic and personal growth. A small percentage found issues with career services and inconsistent academic support.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.

With ~74% positive reviews, students frequently highlight good experiences and people. However, ~5.4% of feedback mentions low academic rigor and organizational issues.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

All 11 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight the practical application of knowledge, international environment, and ability to gain insights for career and personal life.

Based on a single review with a 1/5 rating, ~100% of feedback is negative. The student highlights a lack of promised tutor interaction and support, experiencing the opposite of the advertised course delivery.

Rating distribution
5★
58%
27%
25%
27%
71%
100%
0%
4★
34%
45%
44%
46%
21%
0%
0%
3★
5%
21%
19%
22%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
4%
6%
3%
7%
0%
0%
1★
0%
4%
6%
3%
0%
0%
100%
Most useful review
Most liked
Overrated.

In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.

Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Its ok

The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

The attitude and the atmosphere

The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close