Centro Federal de Educacao Tecnológica de Minas Gerais - CEFET-MG vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte - UniBH
Side-by-side comparison from 184 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent engineering programs and skilled, approachable professors.
- +Well-equipped facilities and strong practical learning resources.
- +Positive and life-changing academic experience.
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
- +Good infrastructure and organized institution
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
- +Excellent preparation for the job market
- +Strong academic and research focus
- +Excellent, supportive, and knowledgeable professors
- +Modern infrastructure and convenient campus locations
- +Attentive administration and responsive support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant complaint.
- -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
- -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Instruction quality and course content are frequently cited as disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff frustrates students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution earns outstanding marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation**, all receiving perfect scores. Its **Location and Internationality** are also highly commendable at 4.5. The overall **Value** is rated a perfect 5. With no areas scoring below 4.5, the university presents a consistently strong offering.
This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
Perceptions of this institution reveal a strong emphasis on its **location** and **value**, both scoring exceptionally high. Student life and internationality also receive positive, though slightly lower, marks. The weakest areas appear to be **accommodation** and **facilities**, which, while still rated above average, are the lowest-scoring aspects in this evaluation. Professors and overall facilities also received solid scores.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its outstanding **location** and **internationality**, both receiving a perfect score. **Professors**, **student life**, **accommodation**, and **value** also stand out with a 4.5 rating. The only area falling slightly below the top tier, though still strong, is **facilities**, rated at 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students highlight a strong academic foundation, particularly in engineering and technical fields. They praise well-equipped environments, accessible professors, and valuable hands-on learning through labs and resources.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise teaching quality, dedicated professors, and excellent facilities. A few mentioned a need for more professional education alongside academic focus.
With a 4.67 average rating, nearly 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent professors, modern infrastructure, and broad spaces. Minor criticisms mention the student access system and slow administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show