Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Ironhack
Side-by-side comparison from 158 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly qualified and supportive faculty
- +Excellent infrastructure and resources, including a well-equipped hospital
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs with career-boosting opportunities
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Excellent teaching quality and demanding preparation for the job market.
- +Inspiring and supportive professors with high academic standards.
- +Top-notch research and outstanding facilities/labs.
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Inclusive and diverse student community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality and relevant academic programs
Nothing to show
- -Poor infrastructure and lack of research support.
- -Unclear career path guidance.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unclear course structures lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
Nothing to show
Academics and campus experience are key strengths, with **Professors** and **Location** both scoring an excellent 4.6. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also received solid ratings of 4 and 4.2 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, receiving a 3.4, while **Student Life** is rated moderately at 3.8. Overall, the university offers good **Value** at 4.2.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its value proposition and location, both receiving high marks. Student life and internationality also score well, indicating a positive and globally engaged campus environment. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities and professors are rated solidly in the mid-range.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.
Nothing to show
University reviews are largely positive (~83%), praising exceptional faculty, good campus infrastructure, and career-boosting programs. A small percentage of feedback (~17%) notes issues with research environment and career paths.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
Students highly praise the university's demanding yet effective preparation for the job market, excellent professors, and strong research. The campus and facilities are noted as magnificent and beautiful. Negative feedback is minimal.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
