SKEMA Business School vs California State University - CSU vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Schiller International University vs Converse University
Side-by-side comparison from 264 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Supportive and expert professors
- +Rigorous and informative courses
- +Positive and transformative academic experience
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable professors
- +Small class sizes and personal learning environment
- +Diverse educational opportunities and resources
- +Strong, respected, and comprehensive business programs
- +Supportive community and challenging environment
- +Well-equipped and accessible facilities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Lack of adequate academic and administrative guidance.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in the "Value" category, achieving a high rating of 4.36. "Professors" also received excellent feedback, scoring 4.32. Conversely, "Student Life" garnered the lowest rating at 4.15, representing the weakest area among the surveyed aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive image across its facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its facilities, professors, and location are exceptionally strong, all scoring very similarly high. Student life and accommodation also fare well. The primary area for improvement is internationality, which is rated significantly lower than other categories. Value for money is also rated quite positively, though not at the highest tier.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its professor quality and value, both achieving a perfect 5. Facilities and location also receive very high marks at 4.75. While student life and accommodation are strong at 4.5, the university's internationality, rated at 4.25, is its comparatively lowest performing area, though still a solid score.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Nearly all (98.5%) of 67 reviews are positive, highlighting informative courses and supportive professors. A few reviews mentioned parking challenges. One negative review cited guidance issues and school priorities.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 14 reviews are positive, averaging 4.79/5. Students praise the university's diverse programs, excellent professors, and supportive environment, highlighting small class sizes and mentorship. No negative feedback was provided.
All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight transformative experiences, a supportive environment, and exciting, challenging curricula. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
