emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Zhejiang University - ZJU vs Hangzhou Dianzi University vs Zhejiang University of Science and Technology - ZUST

Side-by-side comparison from 237 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Zhejiang Gongshang University - ZJGSU (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 0/4 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Zhejiang University - ZJU: wins 0/4 categories
Hangzhou Dianzi University: wins 1/4 categories
Zhejiang University of Science and Technology - ZUST: wins 0/4 categories
Zhejiang Gongshang University - ZJGSU: wins 3/4 categories
Zhejiang University of Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: BA International Studies
Best programme: Business English
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
4.23
4.33
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.54
4.32
4.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.05
4.37
4.00
3.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.56
4.43
3.67
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.25
4.67
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.40
4.09
4.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.94
3.70
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Supportive and encouraging teachers.
  • +Rigorous academics and personal growth opportunities.
  • +Vibrant international community and appealing campus environment.

Nothing to show

  • +Beautiful and green campus environment.
  • +Positive experience with international studies and cultural immersion.
  • +Engaging and relevant content
  • +Well-structured and easy-to-follow learning path
  • +Practical, hands-on exercises

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent and poor quality of instruction is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving top marks. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Internationality** emerges as the weakest area of assessment. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all received solid, though not exceptional, ratings, indicating a generally positive overall experience.

Nothing to show

This institution receives a strong overall rating, with standout scores in **location** (5) and **professors** and **internationality** (both 4.5). Areas that are good, but could see improvement, include **accommodation**, which scored 3.5. Facilities and student life are rated well at 4, and the value proposition is also considered strong at 4.

This institution receives outstanding scores in several key areas, including facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality, all earning a perfect 5. Accommodations present the sole area for improvement, with a slightly lower rating of 4. Overall, the university offers exceptional value and a well-rounded experience, with its strongest aspects lying in its comprehensive offerings and supportive environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is ~67% positive. Students highlight personal growth, helpful teachers, and challenging academics. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews indicate a highly positive student experience. Recurring themes highlight the campus's aesthetic beauty and the enriching cultural immersion it offers international students.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this program garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its well-structured content, relevance to their field, and clear, engaging presentation. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
58%
50%
67%
0%
50%
100%
0%
4★
29%
41%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
11%
7%
33%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Good for locals, poor management for international students

The university brands itself as the third-best in China. While the classes in English are quite good (and probably easier than those for Chinese students taught in Chinese) all the management for foreign students is very poor and does not represent that of such a prestigious university. Most relevant information, such as those related to the thesis and graduation processes are usually only shared in WeChat groups instead of via mail or a meeting. What’s more, it happens that the management and teachers do not recognize if foreign students received that information. That management is far from professional and causes a lot of unnecessary effort and frustration to us foreign students.

Nothing to show

The beautiful scenery of ZUST

ZUST is one of the more aesthetically pleasing university campuses in Hangzhou. Hangzhou, as a city, is known for its trees and greenery and ZUST proves exactly that. The campus comprises three main parts, namely the North section, the Central section, and the South section. Each part has its unique features that add to the overall beauty of the campus. The North section houses most of the academic buildings, including lecture halls and research centers. The architecture style is modern and incorporates traditional Chinese elements like courtyards and gardens. The Central section is where the administrative buildings are located, and it is also home to the university's library. The library building is one of the iconic structures on campus, featuring a unique design that blends with the surrounding landscape. The South section is where the students' dormitory buildings are located, and it features an artificial lake that adds to the visual appeal of the area. The lake is surrounded by willow trees, and there are numerous benches and walking paths for students to enjoy. One of the highlights of the campus is the Zijingang Campus Ecological Park, which is located adjacent to the university. The park is a vast natural reserve, spread over an area of 7.8 square kilometers, and features hills, valleys, forests, and streams. The park provides students with plenty of opportunities for outdoor activities, such as hiking and cycling, and is an excellent place to escape the bustle of the city and immerse oneself in nature. Overall, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology is an excellent choice for students looking for a beautiful campus that combines modern architecture with natural beauty. The university's location in Hangzhou adds to the scenic appeal, with the city being known for its beautiful scenery, including the iconic West Lake.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close