Yalova University - YAU vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Lahore School of Economics vs Adeleke University - AU vs Kafr El-Sheikh University - KFS

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Yalova University - YAU: wins 1/5 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 4/5 categories
Lahore School of Economics: wins 0/5 categories
Adeleke University - AU: wins 0/5 categories
Kafr El-Sheikh University - KFS: wins 0/5 categories
IEDC-Bled School of Management: wins 0/5 categories
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: MBA
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Marketing and Media
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Best programme: Archaeology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.67
3.44
3.89
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.00
5.00
Win
3.60
3.56
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.33
Win
4.06
3.89
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
5.00
3.25
3.11
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.33
Win
3.03
3.56
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
5.00
3.97
4.11
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
5.00
Win
2.42
3.44
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Up-to-date systems and modern teaching methods.
  • +Challenging and engaging coursework.
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Supportive and engaging faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life and extracurricular activities
  • +High-quality teaching and relevant programs
  • +Supportive and interactive learning environment
  • +Practical, industry-focused coursework and development
  • +Strong practical training and skill development.
  • +Well-established programs and scientific subjects.
  • +Access to modern facilities and resources.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a major concern.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of student engagement and support is frequently criticized.
  • -An overwhelming academic workload and a rigid learning approach are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being is a major concern.
  • -Lack of clarity and organization in course structure and communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues causing frustration and delays.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its Facilities and Internationality, both receiving perfect scores. The Value proposition also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, Accomodation is identified as a significant area for improvement, scoring the lowest. Professors, Student Life, and Location all fall within a solid mid-to-high range.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Overall, the university presents a mixed performance according to the provided ratings. Its strongest areas are **Professors** (4.06) and **Value** (3.97), indicating satisfaction with teaching quality and the return on investment. The weakest category is **Accomodation**, scoring a low 2.42. **Facilities** and **Location** also received moderate scores. **Student Life** and **Internationality** fall in the middle range of the evaluations.

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university excelling in **Value**, achieving a rating of 4.11. Facilities and Professors also received strong scores around 3.89. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the weakest area, scoring 3.11. Location and Student Life were rated moderately at 3.56, with Accommodation scoring 3.44. The university demonstrates a generally positive, albeit varied, performance across these key indicators.

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.33. Professors and student life are also highly rated at 4.0. The weakest areas are **internationality** (3.0) and accommodation (3.33). Facilities score a respectable 3.67, with value also at 4.0.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students appreciate the updated systems and challenging, modern teaching methods.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic enrichment and engaging campus life with active societies. A small ~8% of feedback points to administrative issues and heavy academic burden.

With a 3.89 average rating from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight academic quality and a supportive environment, while ~11% note challenges with campus facilities like water and cafeteria food.

With ~67% positive feedback, reviewers praise the university for community, scientific subjects, practical training, and skill development for the job market. One review mentions access to modern facilities and resources.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
36%
89%
67%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
25%
11%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Lse is not a university but a school

hello i am a student doing my third year at the Lahore school of economics . Lse is a university with zero student life, Pathetic administration specially the retired majors. They have got few good instructors but still i would not recommend anyone to go there.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close