SKEMA Business School vs Colliery Training College - CTC vs North-West University - NWU vs Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University - SMU vs Gauteng City College - GCC
Side-by-side comparison from 561 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
Nothing to show
- +Excellent support services and helpful faculty
- +Vibrant and organized campus life with social activities
- +Beautiful campus environment conducive to study
- +Holistic healthcare education and interprofessional learning
- +High-quality content and research encouragement
- +Supportive environment and accommodation
- +Engaging teaching and approachable instructors.
- +Excellent career support and networking opportunities.
- +High-quality facilities and resources.
- +Practical, real-world applied learning
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Innovative, critical thinking environment
- +Strong education and job placement reputation
- +Positive student outcomes and career success
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical experience and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on targets over academics.
- -Language barriers making academic engagement difficult.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication from management are major frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for future careers.
- -Administrative and management issues, including payment discrepancies and poor communication.
- -Substandard quality of educational resources and materials.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create uncertainty.
- -Poor administrative support and management.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Value for money stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities. Student Life and Professors also receive commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower than the top-performing metrics.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall profile, particularly excelling in its **Value** and **Professors**, which received the highest marks. **Student Life**, **Location**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are also rated very positively. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, though still a respectable 3.5 out of 5.
**This institution received overwhelmingly low ratings across most categories.** Its weakest areas, scoring a mere 1 out of a possible 5, include facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Student life presented a slightly better, though still low, score of 2. The university's performance is largely characterized by significant shortcomings in fundamental aspects of the educational experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores across most aspects, with facilities, location, and internationality all achieving a perfect 5. Student life, accommodation, and professors also score highly at 4.8. Value for money is rated a perfect 5, indicating overall satisfaction. There are no significantly weak areas identified in these ratings.
This institution excels across most evaluated aspects, with perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. These areas represent its strongest attributes, suggesting a comprehensive and engaging university experience. However, a significant weakness is evident in Accommodations, receiving a score of just 1. Value for money is rated well at 4, indicating a generally positive return on investment despite the notable issue with housing.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
Nothing to show
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 414 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campuses, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. Very minimal negative feedback exists.
With an average rating of 4.8/5, all 5 reviews are positive. Students appreciate the quality education, supportive environment, and opportunities for academic and professional growth within the healthcare sector. There is no negative feedback.
With a single review, the feedback is entirely negative, resulting in a 2/5 average rating. The lone comment highlights concerns about high book costs and inconsistent payment processing by the university.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight an enriching, transformative experience focused on applied sciences and practical learning. They appreciate critical thinking, real-world problem-solving, and supportive, approachable faculty.
One review found the university offered excellent education and reputation, leading to good job prospects. This single positive review contributed to an average rating of 5/5, with no negative feedback.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
