SKEMA Business School vs Colliery Training College - CTC vs North-West University - NWU vs Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University - SMU vs Gauteng City College - GCC
Side-by-side comparison from 578 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
- +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
- +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
Nothing to show
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Holistic, interdisciplinary medical education
- +Strong emphasis on academic integrity and quality content
- +Supportive environment with 100% accommodation
- +Engaging teaching and approachable instructors.
- +Excellent career support and networking opportunities.
- +High-quality facilities and resources.
- +Practical, real-world applied learning
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Innovative, critical thinking environment
- +Strong education and job placement reputation
- +Positive student outcomes and career success
- -Poor management and administrative issues.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance.
- -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Disappointment with outdated and insufficient facilities.
- -Concerns regarding the relevance and quality of course content.
- -Administrative and management issues, including payment discrepancies and poor communication.
- -Substandard quality of educational resources and materials.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create uncertainty.
- -Poor administrative support and management.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution garners significant praise for its **professors** and **value**, both receiving top marks at 4.5 and 4.67 respectively. Student life and internationality also score highly at 4.17. The weakest area highlighted is **facilities**, with a rating of 3.2, while location and accommodation are moderately rated.
**This institution received overwhelmingly low ratings across most categories.** Its weakest areas, scoring a mere 1 out of a possible 5, include facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Student life presented a slightly better, though still low, score of 2. The university's performance is largely characterized by significant shortcomings in fundamental aspects of the educational experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores across most aspects, with facilities, location, and internationality all achieving a perfect 5. Student life, accommodation, and professors also score highly at 4.8. Value for money is rated a perfect 5, indicating overall satisfaction. There are no significantly weak areas identified in these ratings.
This institution excels across most evaluated aspects, with perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. These areas represent its strongest attributes, suggesting a comprehensive and engaging university experience. However, a significant weakness is evident in Accommodations, receiving a score of just 1. Value for money is rated well at 4, indicating a generally positive return on investment despite the notable issue with housing.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.
Nothing to show
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the quality of education, practical application, and supportive environment, noting the university's focus on healthcare and research.
With a single review, the feedback is entirely negative, resulting in a 2/5 average rating. The lone comment highlights concerns about high book costs and inconsistent payment processing by the university.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight an enriching, transformative experience focused on applied sciences and practical learning. They appreciate critical thinking, real-world problem-solving, and supportive, approachable faculty.
One review found the university offered excellent education and reputation, leading to good job prospects. This single positive review contributed to an average rating of 5/5, with no negative feedback.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
