Politecnico di Milano vs Istituto Marangoni vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs SDA Bocconi School of Management vs IULM University
Side-by-side comparison from 101 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and challenging, rewarding programs
- +Strong practical focus with real professionals and innovative projects
- +Supportive international environment and experienced supervisors
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
- +Strong career development and industry connections
- +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment
Nothing to show
- +Career-focused and interesting courses
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Modern and well-equipped campus facilities
Nothing to show
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Teaching quality and student support are poor.
- -Arbitrary grading and disorienting administrative processes are issues.
- -Lack of encouragement for creativity and experimentation is noted.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive fees and unclear financial policies are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from faculty and administration are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with **Location** and **Value** receiving particularly high marks. **Internationality** also scores well, suggesting a globally engaged environment. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest rated category, indicating potential room for improvement. Ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life** are also solid, contributing to a generally positive perception.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, and location are all highly rated, achieving near-perfect marks. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other metrics. The overall value of the university is rated very favorably.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
With an average rating of 4.06/5 from 82 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, praising academic quality and research facilities. A small minority (~4.9%) reported issues with teaching performance and support.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students praise the interesting courses, career opportunities, supportive staff, and good facilities. Some mention a desire for more international focus.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
