The University of Manchester vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs Cranfield University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 807 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching and strong support.
- +Inspiring and motivating learning environment.
- +Great online learning experience and quick registration.
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive tutors and helpful resources
- +Engaging course content with practical application
- +Strong sense of community and social life
- +Strong postgraduate focus and specialized programs
- +World-class research facilities and industry partnerships
- +Excellent career services and networking opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging and supportive faculty.
- +Rewarding learning experience and skill development.
- +Positive and inclusive university atmosphere.
- +Strong student support and inclusive environment.
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable lecturers.
- +Relevant courses and career preparation.
- -Outdated or non-functional facilities and insufficient practical experience.
- -Unhelpful or irrelevant course content and poor lecturer engagement.
- -Disorganized course structure and inaccessible professors.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Delayed result publication and unhelpful professors are major concerns.
- -The facilities are outdated and need modernization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders academic progress.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Facilities and resources appear to be outdated or insufficient.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and support exists between different student groups.
- -Unreasonable payment deadlines conflicting with student finance release.
- -Poor communication and unclear financial expectations.
This university garners excellent marks across multiple categories, with **Internationality** and **Location** being its strongest points, both scoring above 4.5. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received high praise. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. The overall **Value** and **Professors** also received solid, above-average scores.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
With outstanding scores in **Internationality** (4.67), this institution also boasts strong performances in **Facilities** (4.47) and **Professors** (4.47). **Value** (4.45) is also highly rated. The **Accommodation** (4.06) is the lowest scoring area, though still a respectable figure, with **Location** (4.14) and **Student Life** (4.17) also performing moderately well.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and resources. Professors receive an excellent rating of 4.5, and facilities are also highly regarded at 4. A respectable score of 4 for value suggests a worthwhile investment for students. Areas requiring improvement include location, which received a lower score of 2.5. Student life and internationality are rated moderately at 3.5, while accommodation stands at 3.75.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This university is highly regarded by students, with particularly strong performance in **Professors** (4.25) and **Location** (4.218). Student life and internationality also received excellent scores. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Accomodation** (3.86). Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation across key aspects of the student experience.
Performance across key university metrics shows a generally positive reception. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Accommodation, however, presents the weakest area according to these ratings. Internationality and value also score well, indicating broad strengths, while facilities and location fall in the middle of the spectrum.
Approximately 88% of reviews are positive, praising online programs, engaging teaching, and a motivating environment. A small percentage (about 1.3%) expressed dissatisfaction with course content and professor accessibility.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With a 4.42 average rating from 98 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong course content, practical application, community, and social life. A small ~2% of reviews mentioned issues with delayed results and professor engagement.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~74% praise Cranfield University's postgraduate focus, industry links, research facilities, and career services. No negative feedback was provided.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With a 4.09 average rating from 45 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, helpful lecturers, and a positive atmosphere. A small ~4% of reviews expressed dissatisfaction.
Strong support services and dedicated lecturers are frequently praised, creating a positive learning environment for ~89% of students. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with enrollment and payment processes.
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Cranfield University, established in 1946 as the UK's only exclusively postgraduate university, is producing global leaders in technology and management through its world-class expertise, large-scale facilities, and unrivalled industry partnerships. Likes: * Located in the heart of the Oxford-Cambridge Arc in the United Kingdom. * Research facilities and industry collaborations. * Excellent career services. * World-Class Library. * Good student-to-faculty ratio. Dislikes: * Because the campus is located in a village, you will miss some of the entertainment and conveniences of a city, but you will make wonderful friends on campus. * It is not a Russell Group university, despite being a high-caliber institution.
Nothing to show
The University of Lincoln can be likened to a home of everyone. The diversity of students in the school gives a global experience within the small community and so you do not have to travel far and wide when you have the world around you. Studying at Lincoln exposes one to not just academic approach of life but also a rich blend of multicultural and global context of life. If you want to experience the world, come to the University of Lincoln.
Nothing to show
