Université Paris Descartes vs ESSEC Business School vs University of Iceland - HÍ vs Cadi Ayyad University Marrakesh vs FST Marrakech
Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Welcoming and supportive community
- +High-quality, engaging professors
- +Excellent free facilities and resources
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences.
- +High quality of higher education.
- +Supportive & approachable professors
- +Wide range of academic programs & specializations
- +Calm, focused academic environment with practical learning
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, practical instruction with professional instructors
- +Modern facilities and a vibrant multicultural environment
- +Valuable career preparation through projects, internships, and international programs
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Communication and transparency from the institution are lacking.
- -Outdated and poor-quality facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unreliable instructors are frustrating.
- -Lack of new hires and outdated faculty negatively impacts the student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources lead to a poor learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern equipment hinder educational progress.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication create frustration.
This institution receives high marks for its **value (4.4)** and **professors (4.2)**, alongside excellent **facilities** and **internationality** (both 4). However, **student life** and **accommodation** are identified as areas for potential improvement, each receiving a rating of 3.2. The **location** is rated moderately at 3.6.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are areas with the lowest scores, both at 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in these domains.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across various aspects. Location stands out as a strength, receiving a strong rating of 4. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring a 3. Other categories, including professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized strengths.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
When examining this university's performance, notable strengths emerge in the **professors** and **accommodation** categories, both receiving a high score of 4. However, **facilities** and **internationality** present areas for improvement, scoring a lower 2. The university offers a moderate experience in terms of **location** and **student life**, with a value rating of 4 suggesting good return on investment.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, approximately 80% of feedback is positive. Students praise the welcoming and supportive environment, kind professors, and excellent facilities. A minor point noted is the school's location.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight practical work and the university's quality. A minor concern involves mandatory Icelandic subjects in some specializations.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, a calm academic environment, and practical learning opportunities. A small portion of feedback, about 11.1%, notes occasional teacher unreliability and poor facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a single review with a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights a great learning environment, modern facilities, and excellent instructors. Group projects, internships, and exchange programs are also noted as strengths.
Nothing to show
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
