SKEMA Business School vs The New School vs Huntington University vs Schiller International University vs Fort Valley State University - FBSU
Side-by-side comparison from 198 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Personalized, adaptable programs and learning
- +Supportive, engaging faculty and staff
- +Vibrant city environment with opportunities
- +Inclusive and supportive campus environment
- +Engaging extracurriculars and personal development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and student well-being support
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Small university, deep connections, family atmosphere
- +Quality teaching
- +Beautiful campus
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and networking opportunities are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some instructors lacking engagement.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Poor communication and unclear instructions from administration.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful faculty and support staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. **Professors** are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately, while **Value** sits in a similar range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Value** and **Professors**, receiving the highest marks in these areas. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score well. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest aspect, with the lowest rating. The remaining categories, including **Location** and **Internationality**, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential development.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
A robust academic environment is indicated by the university's strong performance across most categories. It excels particularly in the quality of its professors and its internationality, both receiving perfect scores. While the majority of ratings are very high, around 4.5, no specific area is rated significantly lower, demonstrating a consistently positive experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting fulfilling academic experiences and strong communities. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.
All eight reviews are positive, averaging 4.13/5 stars. Students highlight diversity, well-organized extracurriculars, and a supportive learning environment with skilled professors and counselors. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
The university is highly recommended, with ~100% of reviews being positive. Students praise the quality teaching and family atmosphere. Some mention challenges with housing availability.
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
