SKEMA Business School vs Hult International Business School vs Schiller International University vs Leadership Exchange vs Manchester University
Side-by-side comparison from 257 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs with practical, career-focused learning
- +Diverse, international student environment and collaborative experiences
- +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive career services
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
- +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, supportive teaching and approachable, knowledgeable faculty.
- +Strong academic structure and engaging, detailed course content.
- +Positive and encouraging learning environment with ample opportunities for personal growth and connection.
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable professors
- +Small class sizes and personal learning environment
- +Diverse educational opportunities and resources
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Faculty and teaching quality are criticized for prioritizing profit over education and lacking effective guidance.
- -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create difficulty in tracking deadlines and managing studies.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
- -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of community and isolating campus location.
- -Poor advisor relationship and guidance.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners commendable ratings across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving an impressive 4.39. Location and facilities also score highly, around 4.24 and 4.23 respectively. Student life and value are rated favorably at 4.14 and 4.05. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.59.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Nothing to show
Across various aspects, the university receives favorable ratings, with professors emerging as the strongest area at 4.43. Location and internationality also score well, both above 4.2. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3.17, suggesting room for improvement in this category.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its facilities, professors, and location are exceptionally strong, all scoring very similarly high. Student life and accommodation also fare well. The primary area for improvement is internationality, which is rated significantly lower than other categories. Value for money is also rated quite positively, though not at the highest tier.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With a 4.35/5 average rating from 156 reviews, ~87% praised diverse subjects, practical skills, international diversity, and career support. A small minority (~2.6%) cited poor management, communication, and disorganization.
Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
Approximately 86% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, quality teaching, and supportive faculty. A small portion of feedback, around 14%, mentions difficulties finding community and challenging advisor relationships.
All 14 reviews are positive, averaging 4.79/5. Students praise the university's diverse programs, excellent professors, and supportive environment, highlighting small class sizes and mentorship. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
