The University of Manchester vs Manchester Metropolitan University vs University of Bolton vs General Assembly vs Mellor Financial Training
Side-by-side comparison from 469 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and engaging learning environment with supportive and responsive tutors.
- +Vibrant student life and social experiences alongside academic pursuits.
- +High-quality, well-structured, and engaging programmes, including online options.
- +Informative and relevant courses with practical application
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Welcoming environment and engaging campus activities
- +Passionate and supportive lecturers
- +Engaging learning experiences and industry-relevant courses
- +Excellent facilities and school environment
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and friendly staff/tutors
- +Welcoming and collaborative student atmosphere
- +Interesting courses and strong academic staff
- -Outdated or non-functional facilities and lack of practical experience.
- -Unorganized course structure and unhelpful, unresponsive, or self-promoting lecturers.
- -Difficulty in reaching professors and poor communication regarding course relevance.
- -Negative teaching quality and unclear assignments.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair marking.
- -Lack of support and a poor learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Misleading course promises and career advice.
Overall, the university presents a strong showing across most metrics. Its highest-rated aspects include Internationality and Location, both exceeding 4.5. Student Life and Facilities also score well above average. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, registering significantly lower than other categories. Value and Professors also received solid, though not leading, scores.
This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest rating at 4.66 and **Facilities** closely following at 4.55. Student life and the academic staff also scored well. The university's weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.93. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded experience, with the value for money and international presence also being positively regarded.
With a robust overall rating, the university excels particularly in its **facilities**, which scored 4.32. Professors also received strong marks at 4.16, followed closely by location and value. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, with a rating of 3.42, while internationality also scored moderately lower than other categories. Student life rounds out the positive feedback.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners high marks for its **facilities**, achieving a commendable 4.3. Professors and location also receive positive feedback, both scoring 4.1. Student life and accommodation are rated a solid 4. However, the university's **internationality** stands out as its weakest area, with a rating of 3.6, followed closely by its value at 3.7.
With a ~98.7% positive sentiment (4.25/5 average), students praise engaging teaching, strong support, and a vibrant campus life. Limited negative feedback (~1.3%) mentions course structure and professor accessibility issues.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, praising good courses, helpful lecturers, and a welcoming atmosphere. ~1.5% of feedback is negative, citing unhelpful tutors and questionable assignments.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive reviews, with approximately 100% of feedback being favorable. Students praise passionate lecturers and the engaging academic environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.9/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly staff, good facilities, and a supportive atmosphere. A small percentage of feedback (~10%) mentions issues with course guidance.
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
I thoroughly love my university. They are so helpful with any problem or situation. Great location and everyone is lovely Always wants the best for students and the facilities are fantastic. They use an app called moodle so you can access lectures PowerPoint slides coursework exams the lot. Student hubs are available across campus to talk to people about any issues you have wether it’s financial issues to mental health issues. Some buildings possibly good be re built/ re decorated to be modernised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show