GBSB Global Business School vs IE University vs Universidad Rey Juan Carlos - URJC vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP
Side-by-side comparison from 480 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Experienced professors and engaging practical learning
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Modern campus and strong career preparation
- +Excellent faculty and well-structured curriculum
- +Valuable practical experience and internship opportunities
- +Supportive environment and advantageous city location
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Supportive, approachable professors and staff
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Flexible study options
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive faculty and international environment
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Marketing promises regarding innovation and flexibility are not met.
- -Academic standards and program content are perceived as low quality.
- -The campus environment is corporate and lacks a traditional college experience.
- -Lack of adequate English proficiency among staff and insufficient international student support.
- -Issues with academic organization, faculty, and teaching methodologies.
- -Inconsistent treatment of double-degree students and administrative challenges.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lack of organization.
- -Lack of support and care for Erasmus students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, particularly in **Internationality** (4.78) and **Location** (4.55). Student life and facilities also receive high marks. The area requiring the most attention is **Accomodation**, which has the lowest rating (3.89). Other categories like Professors and Value are also rated favorably.
Academic departments at this institution are highly regarded, with professors receiving the strongest marks. Areas like student life and location also show a positive reception. On the other hand, internationality and accommodation received the lowest ratings, suggesting potential areas for improvement. The overall value and facilities fall within a moderate range.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
Overall, the university receives positive evaluations across various aspects. Professors are notably well-regarded, followed closely by excellent Facilities. In contrast, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, while Student Life and Value also fell in the mid-range. Location scored moderately.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising professors' experience, international environment, practical coursework, and networking opportunities. The remaining feedback highlights academic deception, low standards, and a corporate campus feel.
~74% of 113 reviews are positive, praising strong faculty, well-structured curricula, and supportive communities. Minimal negative feedback (~4.4%) mentions campus comfort and international student integration.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
With a 4.06 average, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent infrastructure, approachable staff, and a practical learning approach. A small percentage (~4%) noted low professor English levels and disorganization.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
In my opnion is not a bad university but most of the teachers have many titles and certificates that say they are very good on the discipline they teach but they are not very good in the teaching skill. I can understand that some subjects could be boring but I think they can do better effort to encourage the students in their subjects. The approach to the teachers is not bad at all, the time for having an answer to an e-mail is 1 or 2 days (not involving weekends). The classes and most of the facilities (at least in Fuenlabrada) are new and comfortable both for teachers and students. The social aspect maybe is the worse of this university (and most of the Spanish ones I think), because the students come to class from many different places and after the classes most of the link between classmates breaks, so you can´ not do university lifestyle. The Double Degree in BMA+Law that I am doing the overall thinking is that it would be useful for the future so the hopes about the future are high.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
