City St George’s, University of London - City vs University of Westminster vs London South Bank University - LSBU vs Hult International Business School vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 392 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Outstanding and supportive tutors
- +Strong focus on real-world experience and career opportunities
- +Positive and friendly university environment
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Hands-on practical learning and industry relevance
- +Diverse and welcoming community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Ample academic and career resources
- +Practical and modern learning environment
- +Strong networking and career opportunities
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Supportive and experienced faculty
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- +Strong academic resources and LSE curriculum
- +Effective administration and flexible learning environment
- +Cooperative professors and engaging teaching methods
- -Poor quality of teaching and academic standards.
- -Administrative and financial concerns.
- -Lack of relevance for experienced professionals.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and delayed feedback.
- -Lack of lecturer passion and engaging teaching methods.
- -Flawed systems and disappointing course delivery.
- -Lack of peer connection and slow communication.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient materials are a concern.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and teaching methods are disliked.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of communication and transparency causes frustration.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.37. **Internationality** also scores exceptionally well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.93. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, Location, and Value all fall within a solid range, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific room for improvement in living arrangements.
Assessing the university's performance reveals notable strengths and areas for improvement. The institution excels in **Location**, earning the highest rating. **Internationality** and **Professors** also receive strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** scores the lowest, indicating a potential area requiring attention. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately well, while **Value** demonstrates a solid, balanced performance.
This university achieves strong marks, particularly in its **Location** (4.40) and **Professors** (4.26). **Internationality** also scores well at 4.10. Conversely, **Student Life** (3.61) and **Accomodation** (3.63) received the lowest ratings. **Facilities** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided scores.
With high scores across most aspects, this institution excels in **Internationality** (4.79) and **Location** (4.61). Professors also receive strong marks (4.49). The weakest area for the university is **Accomodation**, which received a considerably lower rating (3.29) compared to other surveyed categories. Facilities (4.16), Student Life (4.20), and Value (4.15) fall within a solid mid-range.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
This institution receives very positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.5 or higher. **Location** and **Internationality** also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating among the surveyed areas, indicating potential room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are consistently strong.
With an average rating of 4.3/5, approximately 98% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent education, supportive and knowledgeable tutors, and valuable internship opportunities. A very small percentage of negative feedback mentions disappointing teaching quality and relevance for experienced professionals.
Around 98% of 103 reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, supportive learning environments, and helpful resources. A small percentage of feedback mentioned issues with lecture pacing and feedback communication.
Most reviews are positive (~79%), highlighting supportive lecturers, good resources, and a positive learning environment. A small amount of feedback (~2%) notes minor administrative delays.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights excellent career opportunities, networking, and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with professor quality and program materials.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
University of London reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% with 4-5 stars), with an average rating of 4.63. Students praise job-ready skills, cooperative professors, excellent VLE, and comprehensive programs with LSE curriculum. Some noted challenges with online learning and lack of face-to-face interaction.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
During my first year at the university of Westminster I was able to come to three conclusions. The first one is that the university is a great place to connect to people from all around the world, is it also a great place to find friends and teachers that help you find yourself. Second conclusion is that it is not always so fun and beautiful, it is a hard path, where you learn how to be responsible, and that every action that you take for your future has a consequence. It is also a great place to learn from your mistakes and become a better person, you get in contact with different people that teach you many things. Third conclusion is that it is a very cozy place, I love my university because it has a nice and cozy vibe, it is a modern building but inside is very nice. I love how the institution tries to make its students feel comfortable inside.
Study in London without breaking the bank. One of the best modern universities in the United Kingdom. Great for its global appeal and personal approach to student success even after graduation. Located in the centre of one of the biggest cities in the World.
One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
