Bocconi University vs Università di Genova - UniGe vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs Rome Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 339 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Creative Design School (5.00)
Bocconi University: wins 0/7 categories
Università di Genova - UniGe: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/7 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/7 categories
Rome Business School: wins 0/7 categories
MIB Trieste School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Creative Design School: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Milano, Italy
4.20
Read more reviews
107 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc in International Economics and Management
Best programme: Master of Energy Engineering Technology
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Arts and Culture Management
Best programme: MBA in International Business
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Graphic Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.27
3.54
3.92
3.66
4.16
4.61
5.00
Win
Location
4.32
3.91
4.23
4.12
4.61
4.72
5.00
Win
Professors
4.28
4.41
4.14
4.13
4.47
4.64
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.94
3.73
4.22
4.21
4.75
4.56
5.00
Win
Student life
4.19
3.98
4.06
3.85
4.23
4.68
5.00
Win
Value
4.33
4.09
4.14
4.16
4.34
4.67
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.91
3.60
3.78
3.14
3.76
4.50
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent instructors and academic rigor
  • +Strong career and professional opportunities
  • +High-quality, updated courses and organized structure
  • +Structured and meaningful selection process
  • +Clear, professional, and detailed communication
  • +High-quality, relevant education and helpful professors
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +Interdisciplinary, multi-angle approach to complex global issues
  • +Real-world problem focus with scientific analysis tools
  • +Unique city integration and international cohort experience
  • +Industry professional professors and real-world insights
  • +Holistic, practical curriculum and hands-on learning experiences
  • +Diverse global network and international exposure
  • +Practical application and real-world experience
  • +Challenging and impactful personal and professional growth
  • +Strong faculty expertise and valuable networking opportunities
  • +Flexible scheduling and ability to tailor projects
  • +Comprehensive content and portfolio building
  • +Personalized one-to-one tutor support and mentorship
Cons
  • -Administrative problems and chaotic study materials are significant frustrations.
  • -Outdated teaching methods emphasize memorization over understanding and practical application.
  • -Inflexible schedules and limited social/extracurricular opportunities hinder student life and work.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and clear communication is common.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt university life.
  • -Poor course structure and insufficient depth in subject matter are disappointing.
  • -Lack of responsiveness from staff and inadequate problem resolution are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
  • -The quality of education and course content is often disappointing.
  • -Students face issues with receiving promised services and fair treatment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities and resources are frequently criticized as outdated or insufficient.
  • -Course content and delivery methods often fail to meet student expectations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Excessive and confusing administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and limited support for students are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

With an overall positive assessment, this institution excels particularly in its **Location** (4.32) and **Value** (4.33). **Professors** (4.28) also receive strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.91) and **Internationality** (3.94) represent the areas with the lowest ratings among the surveyed aspects. Other categories like Facilities and Student Life fall within a generally favorable range.

Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting strong academic instruction. Student life also scores very well, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Facilities, though adequate, represent the lowest-rated aspect. Overall, the university shows a balanced performance, with particular strengths in teaching quality and student engagement, while facilities could be an area for improvement.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This university demonstrates particular strength in its internationality, receiving a rating of 4.21. Other highly-rated aspects include professors and location, both scoring above 4.12. Student life and value for money also perform well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.14. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.66.

This university presents a well-rounded profile, with exceptionally high marks for its **Internationality (4.75)** and **Location (4.61)**. Professors also received strong endorsements at **4.47**. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, scoring **3.76**, though most other categories, including Student Life and Value, also scored well above average.

This institution achieves strong ratings across multiple aspects. Its **location** stands out as the highest-rated category. While overall scores are consistently high, **accommodation** received the lowest mark, though still a respectable 4.5. The university demonstrates solid performance in facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value.

This institution garners universal praise, achieving perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates exceptional strength in every area with no identified weaknesses, presenting a comprehensively outstanding university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Over 96% of reviews are positive, praising specialized courses, qualified instructors, and professional opportunities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions administrative issues and traditional teaching methods.

With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 27 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students praise program quality, professor support, and structured processes. Some mention minor administrative delays or high costs.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary approaches and real-world relevance. A small percentage of feedback (~16%) mentions issues with organization and professor responsiveness.

~92% of 53 reviews are positive, praising insightful professors and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with diplomas, professional conduct, and website functionality.

With an average rating of 4.79, reviews highlight practical application and deep learning, with ~100% positive feedback. Some suggest minor improvements to career placement.

All 12 reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility, one-to-one tutor support, and portfolio development. The average rating is 5/5.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
33%
36%
48%
66%
79%
100%
4★
52%
41%
41%
26%
21%
21%
0%
3★
6%
26%
23%
19%
6%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
3%
8%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
An amazing experience!

I love the quality of education I received at Bocconi. Having previously studied Management back in Turkey, coming here to do my masters in Marketing Management allowed me to get much more specialisation regarding my field. I got to know more about the data side of marketing, which brought me a whole other perspective. The school itself has many opportunities to make your university life the best possible experience. I enjoyed the seminars held, the extracurricular activities carried out, the opportunities to join an association, and have also been staying in one of the residences of Bocconi, which has made my life so much easier. Overall, I can say that both in terms of the education I got and the campus life Bocconi provided me, I am very satisfied with everything.

It's good but could be better

It's a good university but could be better if there were more laboratories and more practice and if the exams were distributed better. The professors are skilled. It should be one structure for the full university.

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

RBS Business Simulation Game Experience.

Participating in the Business Simulation Game as part of my MBA at Rome Business School was one of the most practical and impactful experiences of the program, It provided a realistic environment to test strategic decision making under pressure and highlighted the strong interdependence between market dynamics, operational performance, cost discipline, people management, pricing strategy and profitability.

Solid program and international atmosphere

The program at MIB Trieste School of Management allowed me to acquire solid management skills in an international context. The courses are well-structured, focused on practice and group projects. I particularly appreciated the cultural diversity and the interaction with students from all over the world. I recommend this school to those looking for an enriching and professional learning experience. The organization could be improved at times, but overall, the experience was very positive.

A Gateway to Graphic Design

Creative Design School (CDS) could not have been a more perfect fit for my plan to embark on a career change to graphic design. The key factors that lead to me enrolling on their Graphic Design Level 2 course was the flexibility of the course (allowing me to work full-time whilst studying), the reasonable course fee and a friendly, no-pressure Skype with the school to explain my situation and see if this would work for me. The course covers the key principles of graphic design and each module presents real-life scenario tasks that build up your portfolio while learning at the same time. I've surprised myself at how my skills have developed as I complete each module. The real bonus to studying with CDS is the amazing 1-to-1 tuition. My tutor, Pete, is always on hand to help, support and encourage me to push my creative boundaries. Having dedicated, personal tuition from someone with such knowledge of the industry is priceless. I would highly recommend this course and studying with CDS in general. I've enjoyed and gained so much from this course that I've already signed up to the Visual Communications course.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close