University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs Technical University of Ostrava - VSB vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs Tomas Bata University in Zlín - UTB vs Anglo-American University - AAU
Side-by-side comparison from 205 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
- +Excellent study environment and facilities
- +Engaging student life and activities
- +Strong academic programs and resources
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
Nothing to show
- +Caring professors and strong community support
- +Enriching international environment and connections
- +Inspiring location and career development opportunities
- +Strong community and supportive teachers.
- +Modern campus and facilities.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities.
- +Modern facilities and IT resources
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Diverse study programs and extracurricular activities
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of effective teaching and learning resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Course content or delivery is often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and internationality, both scoring a high 4.75. Student life, location, and accommodation also receive positive feedback with a 4.5 rating. Professors are rated a strong 4.5 as well. The weakest area, though still good, is value at 4.25.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
Nothing to show
The university garners positive feedback across several key aspects. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.62. Student life and internationality also score highly, both exceeding 4.5. Conversely, accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.20, representing the weakest area. Facilities, professors, and value maintain solid ratings, all above 4.4.
Professors stand out with an impressive rating, reflecting a particular strength in academic instruction. The university also scores highly in location and value. Accommodation presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement compared to other aspects of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid, well-rounded performance.
This institution receives high marks across most aspects. Its strongest areas are consistently rated at 4.67, notably in location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities, professors, and accommodation also score well, all around 4.33. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture with particularly excellent offerings in its surrounding environment and student experience.
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise the study environment, teachers, facilities, and student life, highlighting well-stocked libraries, modern labs, and good recreational spaces.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
All 66 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a strong sense of community, supportive and knowledgeable professors, and valuable international experiences. The university's location and resources are also frequently praised.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 45 reviews, students praise the strong sense of community, wonderful professors, and modern, welcoming campus. There are no reported negative experiences.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, all 3 reviews are positive. Students highlight modern IT tech, many study opportunities, and preparation for IT careers. They also praise great programs, young teachers, and a beautiful city with remote or daily study options and good accommodation.
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Great sense of community, once you find the right people. The professors are wonderful, especially Dr. Hurtová and Dr. Tomášková. The entire university recently had a massive facelift, so the whole institution feels modern and welcoming.
Nothing to show
