Central European University - CEU vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE vs ESSCA School of Management vs University of Miskolc
Side-by-side comparison from 139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting study options
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive and expert faculty and staff
- +International atmosphere and location
- +Supportive and approachable teachers and staff.
- +Valuable business knowledge and specialization opportunities.
- +Enjoyable campus life and enriching activities.
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
- +Friendly, international learning environment
- +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
- +Organized classes, useful study materials
- +Supportive and career-focused professors
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently cited.
- -There is a general dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Inadequate professors and poor organization
- -Expensive and irrelevant courses
- -Unmotivated student body
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
Regarding university ratings, the strongest area is undeniably Location, scoring a remarkable 4.62. Internationality and Value also received high marks, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.23. Facilities and Student Life received moderate scores around 3.7, while Professors were rated positively at approximately 4.1.
The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. While accommodations are generally positive, they represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with particularly notable strengths in its physical environment and student engagement.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive academic environment. The university excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive strong marks, reflecting a high quality of instruction. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities** and **Value** indicate moderate satisfaction, while **Internationality** scores well, suggesting a diverse community.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Internationality** (4.6) and **Location** (4.4). Ratings for **Facilities** (4.208), **Professors** (4.2), and **Value** (4.28) are also solid. Areas with slightly lower scores include **Accomodation** (4.083) and **Student Life** (3.84).
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 43 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students praise rigorous and well-structured programs with knowledgeable professors and a broad curriculum. Some mention administrative disorganization and language barriers with certain staff.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 18 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong Economics and Business programs, international atmosphere, and a strategic campus location. No negative reviews were recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising teachers, learning, and campus life. A small portion of negative feedback (around 6.5%) mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.
Nearly all reviews are positive (~92%), with students highlighting helpful professors, a strong community, and practical learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~0%) was negative.
Nothing to show
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
Previously studying in the USA, moving to Budapest was a complete culture shock. However, this university offers a vigorous program with ample opportunities for students who want a career in diplomacy and foreign affairs. I feel constantly challenged and surrounded by bright-minded thinkers. Throwing myself into a new country, new culture, and new language has allowed me to truly be immersed in this field of study. While the program is in English, there are ample opportunities for additional foreign language classes. The fact that this university offers scholarships and the base price of tuition is already so low, is an added bonus.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.
