EDEM vs Tanta University vs University of Siena - UNISI vs Elmhurst College vs Swiss School of Management - SSM

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
EDEM: wins 0/5 categories
Tanta University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Siena - UNISI: wins 0/5 categories
Elmhurst College: wins 0/5 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 4/5 categories
Technical University of Munich - TUM : wins 0/5 categories
University of Baltimore - UB: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Valencia, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Sustainability
Best programme: Business Information Systems
Best programme: Language for Intercultural Communication
Elmhurst, Illinois, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
2.38
3.81
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.50
4.00
Location
4.50
3.63
4.44
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Professors
2.50
3.22
4.39
Not rated
4.33
4.75
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.00
2.67
4.04
Not rated
5.00
4.50
5.00
Student life
2.50
2.38
3.75
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.25
4.00
Value
2.50
2.78
4.11
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.25
4.00
Accommodation
3.50
2.83
3.41
Not rated
5.00
3.25
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Intensive, real-world projects and challenging modules
  • +Focus on professional development and company-oriented skills
  • +High academic demand and commitment required
  • +Supportive professors and teaching staff
  • +Positive student experience and sense of belonging
  • +Good balance of academic and social life
  • +Supportive professors and academic environment
  • +Strong international focus and scholarships
  • +Excellent facilities and city integration

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Excellent teaching and knowledgeable professors
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Strong academic programs and career opportunities
  • +personalized attention and professor accessibility
  • +flexible scheduling options
  • +strong business, law, and public affairs programs
Cons
  • -Strict and rigid grading policies frustrate students.
  • -Lack of practical learning opportunities and insufficient feedback.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
  • -Inflexible and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Poor communication and inadequate support create a negative learning experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.5 rating, and offers decent **facilities** and **accommodation** at 3.5. However, areas needing improvement include **professors**, **student life**, and **value**, all scoring a lower 2.5. The university also shows moderate **internationality** with a 3 rating.

This university shows a varied performance across different categories. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, receiving the lowest scores. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall somewhere in the middle, indicating areas for potential improvement and notable strengths.

This university garners strong ratings, with Location and Professors being its standout strengths, both exceeding 4.4. Internationality and Value also score well, above 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation and Student Life present the weakest areas, falling below 3.8. Facilities score moderately, around 3.8. The university offers a well-rounded experience, though improvements could be focused on student housing and campus life.

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Across numerous categories, this institution receives commendable evaluations. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, followed closely by its facilities and internationality. The university also scores well in student life and value. Location is a solid strength. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects.

With excellent scores in several key areas, this institution shines particularly brightly for its professors and accommodation, both earning a perfect five. Students also appreciate its international outlook and strong student life, with facilities and overall value receiving solid four-star ratings. The location is its least celebrated aspect, marked by a three-star score.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3/5, reviews are mixed. Approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting the transformative and professionally focused curriculum, while about 33% is negative, citing a demanding workload and rigid grading policies.

With a 3.22 average rating, approximately 74% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate the balance of study and social life, with good professors and a respectable atmosphere. However, some negative feedback exists regarding lazy student affairs and limited practical education.

University of Siena receives overwhelmingly positive reviews (~100%) with an average rating of 4.37/5. Students praise the supportive environment, helpful professors, and valuable academic programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include great facilities, excellent teaching, and a motivating academic environment. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a sold educational experience in fields like business and law, appreciating small class sizes, personalized attention, and flexible scheduling.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
11%
40%
0%
100%
50%
0%
4★
67%
22%
57%
0%
0%
50%
100%
3★
0%
56%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Evaluating the University of Siena

Advantages -DSU Toscana provides you an accommodation and stipends. That is need based scholarship. Most low-income students are provided. -Siena has many professors who are highly ranked according to Google Scholar. -City is small and all campuses can be reached easily. -You have 6 chances to make your grades better for whole year. Disadvantages -City is labyrinth. -Courses are not well organised. There is only one accounting related course in MSc International Accounting and Management. -Most professors don't care about your thesis, process and writings. -During the lesson, professors use Italian words. That is unacceptable.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close