Stockholm University - SU vs North Carolina State University - NCSU vs University of the People - UoPeople vs Western Washington University vs India Institute of Technology Delhi - IITD
Side-by-side comparison from 3,166 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and knowledgeable professors
- +Engaging and flexible course content
- +Supportive campus environment
- +Diverse student body and lively campus atmosphere
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
- +Abundant opportunities for involvement and personal development
- +Affordable and flexible online education
- +Global learning community and diverse perspectives
- +Dedicated instructors and program support
- +Beautiful campus and location
- +Excellent academics and career preparation
- +Abundant clubs, events, and supportive community
- +Engaging campus life and co-curricular opportunities
- +Supportive professors and good atmosphere
- +Excellent hostel life and food
- +Knowledgeable and dedicated lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment and community
- +Affordable tuition
- +Flexible, affordable, and accessible learning
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Valuable guidance and encouragement
- -Poor administrative and management responsiveness to student issues.
- -Lack of adequate support for academic and personal conflicts.
- -Lack of active faculty engagement and mentorship
- -Insufficient support for student success
- -Concerns regarding lab safety and professional development
- -Administrative and management issues, including data breaches and poor platform navigation.
- -Unexpected and high mandatory exam fees despite the "tuition-free" claim.
- -Lack of effective community and collaboration tools for students.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources.
- -Lack of clear guidance and support for coursework.
- -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring concern.
- -Students are frustrated by inefficient administrative processes and poor communication.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as outdated and unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
- -A lack of essential resources and support systems hinders the learning experience.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues create constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from instructors cause frustration.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie with its professors, receiving a strong rating of 4.24. Value and facilities also scored well, both above 4.1. Conversely, the location was the least favorably rated category at 3.77. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4 and 3.85 respectively.
A well-rounded university experience is reflected in these ratings, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.34. Student Life and Value are also strong, both scoring above 4.2. Facilities and Location are well-regarded, while Accomodation sits slightly lower. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a rating of 3.83.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Professors** (4.74) and **Internationality** (4.83), along with high marks for **Value** (4.79). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.90) received the lowest rating, while **Facilities** (3.43) and **Location** (3.35) also scored moderately. **Student Life** sits comfortably in the middle at 3.64.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **location**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, which are rated highly at 4.8. Other positive aspects include the quality of **professors** and **accommodation**, both scoring 4.4. The university's weakest area is **internationality**, with a rating of 3.6. **Student life** and **value** are moderately rated.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for both location and value. Internationality also stands out as a significant strength. While the facilities and student life are well-regarded, and professors receive positive marks, accommodation presents the weakest area, falling considerably below other categories.
Assessing the institution's performance across various metrics reveals a diverse set of strengths and weaknesses. Student life emerges as the strongest area, with a notable 4.38 rating, closely followed by value at 4.4. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation received the lowest scores, both at 3.55. Professors and internationality are rated solidly in the mid-range.
Exceptional scores in several key areas highlight this institution's strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. However, accommodation appears to be a weaker area, with a rating of three, suggesting room for improvement. This marks a generally very positive university profile.
With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising approachable and knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and good campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.
With ~98% positive feedback and an average 4.2/5 rating, students praise the vibrant campus, supportive professors, diverse student body, and abundant opportunities. A small percentage noted lacking departmental support.
University of the People is highly praised for its affordability, flexibility, and global learning community, with ~99.6% of reviews being positive. Minor concerns include navigation and occasional data security issues.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 based on 5 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive. Students praise the beautiful campus and Bellingham location, along with excellent academics, abundant clubs, and affordable tuition. Instructors and fellow students are also highly regarded.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the study environment, great atmosphere, nice professors, and enjoyable hostel life. Some noted placement needs improvement.
The university garners a 4.07/5 rating with approximately 74% of reviews being positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, a strong sense of community, and a solid academic foundation. A small percentage of feedback mentioned limited facilities.
Both reviews are positive, with students appreciating flexible lecture times, affordability, and supportive staff and professors. The average rating is 5/5, reflecting ~100% positive sentiment.
SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.
Nothing to show
“University of the People is helping me translate a long history of practical experience into a formal foundation,” he says. “Most importantly, it is helping me prove to myself that persistence, when paired with structure, can turn even difficult chapters into a hopeful future.”
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying English and Literature at ABSU was a transformative journey that extended far beyond the classroom. The program offered a deep dive into classic and contemporary works, fostering critical thinking and a profound appreciation for storytelling. The dedicated faculty(ELSA) as it was called encouraged thoughtful analysis and creative expression allowing me to connect literary themes with real world experiences. This course not only enriched my understanding of literature but also equipped me with essential communication and analytical skills that continue to shape my personal and professional life.
Nothing to show
