ESSEC Business School vs Waterford Institute of Technology - WIT vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs University of Moulay Ismail vs D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan Technical University
Side-by-side comparison from 59 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Supportive and helpful tutors
- +Valuable educational and practical knowledge
- +Positive peer recommendations
- +Clear program specialization after common core
- +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education
- +Dedicated, knowledgeable professors encouraging critical thinking.
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
- +Sense of freedom and self-expression.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong technology focus and practical application of learning.
- +Vibrant, multicultural, diverse, and inclusive environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative and management issues, including timetable changes and unorganized lecturers.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure like unreliable WiFi and non-functional printers.
- -Lack of engagement with students not on the main campus and shifting academic requirements.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as below expectations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive faculty create a poor academic experience.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
This institution demonstrates a solid overall performance, with notable strengths in **Student Life** (3.75) and **Professors** (3.75). **Location** also receives a positive score (3.525). Conversely, areas requiring attention include **Internationality** (3.025) and **Facilities** (3.125), which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Accommodations and value are rated moderately.
With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.
This institution's strengths lie notably in its professors, who received a strong rating, and its perceived value. Conversely, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received comparatively lower scores, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects. Internationality also sits below the midpoint of the ratings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a strong overall profile. Facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value all received high marks of 4. However, the location and accommodation categories scored slightly lower, with a rating of 3, indicating these aspects could be areas for improvement.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
University reviews are generally positive (~75%), with students appreciating helpful tutors and relevant course content. A small portion (~25%) of feedback notes issues with timetable changes, disorganization, and poor facilities.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 from 4 reviews, student feedback is ~50% positive. Recurring praise highlights knowledgeable professors and personal growth. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a single review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This positive feedback (~100%) highlights the university's technological focus, multicultural environment, and practical learning opportunities.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
