Concordia University vs HEC Montreal vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Greystone College vs Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 182 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and relevant programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Inclusive and collaborative environment fostering entrepreneurialism
- +Engaging professors and diverse course offerings
- +Accessible degree pathways with flexible entry requirements
- +Rigorous, career-focused programs with strong industry connections
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world project opportunities
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
- +Effective teaching and supportive professors
- +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
- +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Ineffective teaching and poor exam quality are major concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of student support are frustrating.
- -Unengaging lectures and difficult-to-understand instructors are prevalent issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in course content.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
- -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
- -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
- -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, reflecting positive student experiences and perceived worth. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.944, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Student life and value stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving scores above 4.5. Location represents the weakest area, though still rated favorably at over 4.0. Facilities, professors, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4.29 average rating from 136 reviews, ~88% are positive, highlighting inclusivity, practical learning, and great professors. A small ~3% of feedback mentions issues with teacher clarity, exam quality, and unaccommodating professors.
Most students praise rigorous, career-focused programs that prepare them for the job market and offer practical learning. Excellent faculty and industry connections are recurring themes, with ~0% negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
