SKEMA Business School vs Arizona State University - ASU vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Schiller International University vs Courses for Success
Side-by-side comparison from 430 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International opportunities and diverse student body
- +Practical, career-focused programs with industry-relevant skills
- +Supportive faculty and excellent campus infrastructure
- +Critical thinking and personal growth
- +Supportive instructors and diverse community
- +Practical experience and career preparation
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
Nothing to show
- +Welcoming and inclusive community
- +Beautiful and safe campus environment
- +Supportive and helpful faculty and advisors
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues including poor communication, exam management, and student guidance.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and concerns about racial discrimination.
- -Disorganized programs with excessive workload and unclear evaluation methods.
- -Insufficient support for online students and inflexible course structures.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful TAs.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with Professors and Internationality receiving the highest scores. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Overall, the university presents a generally positive image, with a few specific strengths and one notable area for development.
This university garners strong evaluations across several key areas. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a significant strength in teaching quality. The weakest area is student life, though it still maintains a positive rating. Other aspects such as facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated comparably well, suggesting a generally positive student experience.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Nothing to show
A generally positive university rating profile is presented. The strongest areas include Professors, achieving a high score of 4.64, closely followed by Student Life and Facilities, both scoring above 4.38. Accommodations, while still good at 4.09, represent the weakest surveyed category, with Internationality also slightly lower at 4.07.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With an average rating of 4.36, most students (~90%) highlight practical courses, career opportunities, and international experiences. A small percentage (~3%) report issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With ~99% positive sentiment, reviews highlight critical thinking, diverse programs, and supportive instructors. A small ~1% of feedback mentions issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
Colorado State University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly rated. Students frequently praise the university's beautiful campus, welcoming atmosphere, and strong sense of community. Academic advisors are noted for their exceptional support, significantly contributing to student success.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
