SKEMA Business School vs The University of Akron - UA vs Schiller International University vs Thomas Edison State University vs Converse University
Side-by-side comparison from 202 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Engaging, knowledgeable, and committed professors
- +Supportive and stimulating learning environment
- +Excellent campus life and community events
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Flexible online courses and credit transfer
- +Supportive faculty, staff, and advisors
- +Comprehensive and challenging curriculum
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable professors
- +Small class sizes and personal learning environment
- +Diverse educational opportunities and resources
- +Strong, respected, and comprehensive business programs
- +Supportive community and challenging environment
- +Well-equipped and accessible facilities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of career support and outdated curriculum are concerning.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities and location, both receiving perfect scores. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are also highly regarded, all earning a solid 4.5 out of 5. Professors are rated slightly lower, at 4.5, but still represent a very positive aspect of the institution.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners top marks for its excellent facilities, prime location, and accommodation. Professor quality and international appeal are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life received a notably low score, indicating a significant area for improvement in social engagement and campus activities.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its facilities, professors, and location are exceptionally strong, all scoring very similarly high. Student life and accommodation also fare well. The primary area for improvement is internationality, which is rated significantly lower than other categories. Value for money is also rated quite positively, though not at the highest tier.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its professor quality and value, both achieving a perfect 5. Facilities and location also receive very high marks at 4.75. While student life and accommodation are strong at 4.5, the university's internationality, rated at 4.25, is its comparatively lowest performing area, though still a solid score.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Two reviews show a highly positive sentiment, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, a mentally stimulating and friendly department, and the university's supportive environment for success.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback for Thomas Edison State University is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the flexible, comprehensive curriculum, helpful advisors, and credit transfer policies.
All 14 reviews are positive, averaging 4.79/5. Students praise the university's diverse programs, excellent professors, and supportive environment, highlighting small class sizes and mentorship. No negative feedback was provided.
All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight transformative experiences, a supportive environment, and exciting, challenging curricula. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
