GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs IE University vs Universidad Complutense de Madrid - UCM vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP
Side-by-side comparison from 518 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Practical application of theory and real-world projects
- +Experienced professors with industry insights
- +International environment and networking opportunities
- +High academic standards and challenging programs leading to professional confidence.
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors and staff.
- +Relevant and integrated training with an emphasis on critical analysis and diverse perspectives.
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +High-quality teaching and practical learning approach
- +Excellent university resources and welcoming atmosphere
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Marketing claims do not align with the actual educational experience and quality.
- -Program management and administrative processes are inefficient and inflexible.
- -The campus environment is overly corporate and lacks traditional college experiences.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Administrative and bureaucratic issues.
- -Lack of practical application and low academic rigor.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors.
- -Lack of organization and student engagement.
- -Unsupportive environment for international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest suit, boasting an impressive rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like location, student life, and professors also scored well, demonstrating a generally positive overall profile.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a varied performance. The strongest aspects are **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring highly at 4.3. **Value** also received a strong rating of nearly 4. In contrast, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.38. **Facilities** are also a point for improvement, scoring 3.52.
Overall, the university garners favorable assessments in multiple aspects. Strengths lie in its professors, who received the highest rating, closely followed by facilities. Areas for improvement include accommodation and internationality, which received the lowest scores. Student life and location also scored reasonably well, while value sits in the middle range of ratings.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~85%), with students highlighting practical projects, experienced professors, and an international environment. A small percentage (~3%) cite issues like academic standards and misleading marketing.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, challenging coursework, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback notes outdated facilities and some administrative/organizational issues.
~74% of 49 reviews are positive, praising friendly, supportive staff, good teaching, and facilities. Only ~4% of feedback is negative, citing low English proficiency from professors and lack of organization.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
The Universidad Complutense de Madrid is an old and big University. This comes with good and bad things. The best is that it has very very very good teachers and a good quality of studies with a huge variety of choices. But, at the same time the teachers, even though they are very good, they've been teaching for a very long time. Sometimes more than they should and they should have retired a long time ago. Also the bureaucracy is slow and exasperating. The university doesn't even respect their own deadlines and they tend to be a little botchy. In summary, a good university that needs to be renovated.
Nothing to show
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
