Hasselt University - UHasselt vs University of Antwerp vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences vs VIVES University of Applied Sciences - VIVES
Side-by-side comparison from 171 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-organized onboarding and supportive staff
- +Approachable professors and engaging academic environment
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse international community
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +Accessible and responsive administration and teachers
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +Professors' passion, expertise, and support for student success
- +Supportive and welcoming staff and community.
- +Practical, engaging, and challenging courses.
- +Enriching international environment and opportunities.
- +Strong theory-to-practice integration and practical application
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Engaging community activities and supportive environment
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Industry-relevant skills and job preparation
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from administration and faculty.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and poor teaching methods are disappointing.
- -Excessive administrative burden and inefficient management processes
- -Lack of modern technology and outdated facilities
- -Insufficient faculty support and unresponsive staff
- -Negative staff and teacher attitudes created a disrespectful and unsupportive learning environment.
- -Communication and administrative issues were a persistent source of frustration.
- -Some facilities and technological resources were outdated and insufficient.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
With a strong emphasis on academics and campus environment, this university garners excellent marks in key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.7, closely followed by facilities at 4.53 and value at 4.55. Student life, while still good at 4.15, represents the area with the lowest score. Accommodation also receives slightly lower, though still positive, feedback at 4.05.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
This university garners particularly strong marks in **Internationality** (4.54) and **Location** (4.43), indicating these are significant advantages. Areas like **Professors** (4.29) and **Value** (4.33) also receive commendation. The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation** (4.02), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with standout strengths.
This university garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving a high rating of 4.6. **Value** also stands out at 4.46. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.94, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates solid performance across most surveyed categories.
Overall, this institution receives a positive evaluation, with particularly strong scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated at approximately 4.3. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also received solid ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation** at around 3.7 and **Internationality**, which scored approximately 3.56.
An excellent overall assessment is evident, with the university excelling particularly in **Value** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also garners a strong score. The **Student Life** category, while still positive, shows a slightly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.65/5, reviews highlight approachable professors and a welcoming atmosphere. Students appreciate the well-structured onboarding and enriching diversity.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
Nearly all 52 reviews are positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight accessible administration, responsive and passionate teachers, and a welcoming international atmosphere.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 35 students rating it 4-5 stars. Recurring themes highlight a supportive, embracing "family" atmosphere, with welcoming staff and engaging, practical courses.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences is highly recommended, with ~89% of reviews being positive. Students praise well-structured lessons, practical application, and good facilities. Some minor areas for improvement include more teacher support during practical sessions.
With an average rating of 4.46, approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning, practical skills for industry, and approachable teachers. One negative review mentioned disrespectful staff attitudes.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Wide range of knowledge acquired and even though this comes at the price of a heavy workload, I'd say it's worth it. The professors are very approachable and it is generally a health learning environment. For international students, the tuition is an absolute steal, given the quality of education.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
VIVES University of Applied Sciences really nails that combo of theory and practical learning. Useful information is jam-packed into the courses, and the lab sessions are seriously awesome since we get to mess around with all kinds of aircraft and even helicopters. Plus, all the resources they give us really help us take what we learn in class and use it in the real world without any hassle. You know, some teachers like to let us figure things out ourselves, but most of them are super into explaining stuff and really good at it. All in all, VIVES is a great pick for anyone wanting hands-on, future-oriented learning.
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
